Compared with routine care, early intensive multifactorial therapy shows little effect….
In an effort to determine the benefit of multifactorial treatment on microvascular complications among people with type 2 diabetes, Annelli Sandbaek, MD, PhD, and colleagues conducted a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial at four centers in Denmark, the UK, and The Netherlands. Out of 3,057 people with diabetes detected by a screening process, only 2,861 were eligible for follow-ups. They were assigned to either the intensive treatment or routine care group.
The results from the four centers were collected using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Of the patients who received intensive treatment, 22.7% showed any type of albuminuria, and patients who underwent routine care had 24.4%. Retinopathy was observed in 10.2% of the patients who underwent intensive treatment, whereas 12.1% was seen in routine care patients. When it came to neuropathy, 4.9% was seen in intensive treatment patients, and 5.9% in routine care patients. However, in both groups the estimated glomerular filtration rate increased between baseline and follow-up; 4.31 mL/min was seen in the intensive treatment and 6.44 mL/min in the routine care groups.
According to the results of this study, researchers stated, "Compared with routine care, an intervention to promote target-driven, intensive management of patients with type 2 diabetes detected by screening was not associated with significant reductions in the frequency of microvascular events at five years."
- Albuminuria was 22.7% in the intensive group compared to 24% in the routine care group.
- Retinopathy was present in 10.2% of the patients who underwent intensive treatment, whereas 12.1% was seen in routine care patients
- Neuropathy, 4.9%, was seen in intensive treatment patients, and 5.9% in routine care
Sandbaek A et al. Diabetes Care. 2014; doi: 10.2337/dc13-1544
Diabetes In Control. A free weekly diabetes newsletter for Medical Professionals. News and information for Medical Professionals.