|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
Item #5
Inhaled
Insulin Not As Effective for Asthmatics
More
insulin required for asthmatics to achieve glycemic control
Results of a study using an experimental aerosol insulin device
suggest that diabetic patients with asthma may need to inhale more
insulin to achieve similar glycemic control as their nonasthmatic
counterparts.
The
device, called the AERx insulin Diabetes Management System (AERx
iDMS; Aradigm, Hayward, Calif.), is designed to deliver a
controlled aerosol of liquid human insulin to the deep lungs for
systemic absorption.
To
see if airflow obstruction and other pathophysiological changes in
patients with asthma alter distribution and absorption of inhaled
insulin, Dr. Robert R. Henry of the VA San Diego Healthcare System
in California and colleagues enrolled 17 asthmatic and 28
nonasthmatic diabetics in a two-part, open-label trial. Patients
were excluded for a number of reasons, including treatment with
oral, intravenous, intra-articular, or intra-muscular
corticosteroids within 12 weeks or inhaled corticosteroids within
4 weeks.
In
part one of the study, researchers assessed insulin
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics by having subjects inhale a
single 1.57 mg (45 IU) dose of insulin on each of 2 dosing days.
In part two of the study, they assessed the impact, if any, of
inhaled insulin on pulmonary function by having subjects inhale a
larger dose of insulin (4.7 mg [135 IU]).
Compared
with nonasthmatics, asthmatic subjects absorbed significantly less
inhaled insulin and, as a result, had less reduction in their
blood glucose.
Inhaled
insulin had no impact on pulmonary function. Results showed no
worsening of the patients' hyper-reactivity airway state, wlth,
with no clinically meaningful changes in FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC
values.
"Many
patients with diabetes are reluctant to initiate insulin therapy
because of needle anxiety," Dr. Henry said. "The
availability of a noninvasive insulin delivery system such as the
AERx iDMS will likely result in the earlier institution of insulin
therapy and improved patient compliance, both of which could have
multiple beneficial effects in the short and long run."
Diabetes
Care
2003;26:764-769.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|