This weeks Items

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Item #2 

Maggots Best in Debriding Nonhealing Ulcers

Maggot therapy is more successful in debriding nonhealing ulcers than is continued conventional care.

 

That, according to the results of a retrospective review published in the February issue of Diabetes Care. The investigators suggest that this therapy is worthy of further research to properly define its role.

 

"Over the past few years, there has been a resurgence in the use of maggot therapy, even though its optimal role has not been clearly defined," write Ronald A. Sherman, MD, MSC, and colleagues from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Long Beach and the University of California, Irvine. "Large prospective clinical trials have not been conducted for maggot therapy, and there are no commercial backers to support such studies."

In the study, of 20 nonhealing ulcers in 18 patients, six wounds were treated with conventional therapy, six with maggot therapy, and eight with conventional therapy followed by maggot therapy.

Although conventional therapy failed to achieve any significant debridement during the first 14 days, maggot therapy allowed necrotic tissue to decrease by an average of 4.1 cm2 during the same time frame (P = .02). After five weeks of therapy, necrotic tissue still covered more than 33% of the surface of conventionally treated wounds, but maggot-treated wounds were completely debrided after four weeks of therapy (P = .001). Growth of granulation tissue was faster and wound healing rates were also better with maggot therapy.

"Maggot therapy was more effective and efficient in debriding nonhealing foot and leg ulcers in male diabetic veterans than was continued conventional care," the authors write. "In addition to issues of efficacy and safety, future studies also must address the cost-effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy and conditions in which [it] is likely to be futile."  Diabetes Care. 2003;26:446-451

================================

FACT

The average CRP reading in this country is 1.5. The risk is dramatically higher when the levels hit 3, studies show. CRP tests should be expressed as milligrams per Liter (mg/L) with concentrations of less than 1.0 mg/L defined as low risk, 1.0-3.0 mg/L as average risk and concentrations higher than 3.0 mg/L defined as high risk. 

================================

Let your Patients Enjoy low carb chocolates with no sugar and 1gm of carbohydrate:  Click Here

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

 

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

 


Get the FREE Diabetes In Control Newsletter!

  • * Free Diabetes Related Information.
  • * Participation in Current and Future Studies
  • * Participation in Surveys (honorariums)
  • * Information that better helps your patients.
  • * Stay Current with the most updated information on treatments and medical devices.
  • * Learn about new studies......plus much more...

Simply Enter your Email Address Below to begin receiving the FREE Diabetes In Control Weekly Newsletter in your mailbox.
 

Please specify the format you can receive the newsletter in below

HTML Text AOL

Home · About Us · Advertise · Classifieds · Current News · Downloads · Education · Features · Feedback · Links · New Products · Past Newsletters · Recommend Us · Search · Show All Stories · Studies · Subscribe · Test Your Knowledge · Tools For Your Practice · Writers Archives · Search Our Archives · NewsFeed

We subscribe to the HONcode principles of the Health On the Net Foundation

©Copyright 1999-2003 Diabetes In Control

For Questions about this website click here