|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
Item #15
Combinations Of Antibodies
Predict Diabetes Risk
Measuring
levels of antibodies against beta-cell components can replace islet
cell antibody (ICA) measurements as a screening procedure in relatives
of people with type 1 diabetes.
Researchers from the Hopital Edouard Herriot and INSERM 449, Lyon,
France, enrolled 3,951 first-degree relatives of people with type 1
diabetes. The researchers examined expression of antibodies to
insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and thyrosine phosphatase
(IA-2) as well as ICA levels. The authors assessed the first-degree
relatives, who did not initially show diabetes, on a median 2.2
occasions over a maximum 16-year follow up.
On the first examination, 3.6 percent of the relatives expressed GAD
antibodies. Furthermore, 4.9 and 2.2 percent expressed IA-2 and
insulin antibodies respectively, while 1.1 percent showed high ICA
titers. These antibodies were commoner in the ICA-positive relatives
than the ICA-negative subjects.
Combining antibodies resulted in a specificity of more than 90
percent. The positive predictive value for developing diabetes
depended on the number of positive antibodies. However, combining
antibodies against either GAD and IA-2 or GAD and insulin showed
higher predictive values and were more sensitive than using high ICA
titers. Including insulin autoantibodies increased the predictive
value, although sensitivity declined. The combination of GAD and IA-2
showed a sensitivity and predictive value of 87.8 and 13.8 percent
respectively.
The authors concluded that measuring combinations of antibodies to
beta cell constituents can replace ICA as a screening procedure in
relatives of people with type 1 diabetes. However, antibody-positive
relatives vary markedly in the time that they take to develop
diabetes. Finally, the researchers suggested that genetic marker
importance needs further investigation.
Diabetes Metab
2002;28:279-85.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|