Cozaar
(Losartan) Lowered Risk Of Total Mortality In Patients With Diabetes
By 39% Versus Atenolol
Treatment
with losartan resulted in a 24 per cent reduction in the primary
composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, stroke and heart attack.
In
a pre-specified subgroup of hypertensive patients with diabetes,
Cozaar® (losartan) was significantly more effective in reducing the
combined risk of cardiovascular death, heart attack and stroke,
according to an analysis of the landmark LIFE trial.
These
results were presented Thursday at the joint International Society of
Hypertension/ European Society of Hypertension meeting in Prague,
Czech Republic. This finding is consistent with the beneficial effects
of losartan in reducing the combined cardiovascular morbidity and
mortality demonstrated in the overall LIFE study population.
"Patients
with diabetes are an important patient group, as they have double the
risk of cardiovascular disease, and this risk is further increased by
hypertension," said Lars H. Lindholm, M.D., principal
investigator of the diabetes subgroup analysis, and professor, Umeå
University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. "Losartan has now been shown
to be superior in reducing the combined risk of cardiovascular disease
and death in diabetic patients in the LIFE trial."
"The
observation that losartan has much greater impact on reducing stroke
and the death rate overall obliges us to rethink the way we treat
patients with diabetes who have high blood pressure in Canada,"
said Dr. John Floras, President of the Canadian Hypertension Society,
staff cardiologist and Director of Research, Toronto's University
Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital Division of cardiology.
Findings
from the LIFE (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in
hypertension) substudy in 1195 hypertensive patients with diabetes
showed that treatment with losartan resulted in a 24 per cent
reduction in the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death,
stroke and heart attack compared to the beta-blocker atenolol
(p=0.03). Blood pressure and pulse pressure reductions were similar
with both therapies. In addition, losartan significantly reduced the
risk of cardiovascular death by 37 per cent (p=0.03) and total
mortality by 39 per cent (p=.002).
"A
39 per cent reduction in total mortality with losartan is an important
observation given that the observed reduction is versus an established
antihypertensive, atenolol. The LIFE study showed that it matters how
we lower blood pressure," Dr. Lindholm said.
In
comparison, in the 9,193-patient LIFE study as a whole, losartan
significantly reduced the combined risk of cardiovascular death, heart
attack and stroke -- the primary endpoint of the study -- in patients
with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) by 13 per
cent compared to atenolol (p=0.021). In addition, losartan reduced the
risk of stroke by 25 per cent (p=0.001). These results occurred even
though blood pressure was reduced to a similar level in both the
losartan and atenolol treatment groups.
"In
another pre-specified subgroup of patients with isolated systolic
hypertension, the findings on stroke with losartan versus atenolol
were consistent with those seen in the overall study population,"
said Sverre Kjeldsen, M.D., Ph.D., a LIFE Steering Committee member,
and adjunct professor of medicine, University of Michigan, and chief
physician of Cardiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
"The data on this important group of patients are scheduled for
presentation later this year. It is widely accepted that elevated
systolic blood pressure is an even stronger risk factor for
cardiovascular events than diastolic blood pressure."
Diabetic
study patients were 55-80 years old with previously treated or
untreated hypertension and signs of LVH as measured by
electrocardiogram (ECG). Patients were randomized to losartan or
atenolol after one to two weeks of placebo if trough sitting blood
pressures were 160 to 200 mmHg systolic and 95 to 115 mmHg diastolic.
Mean follow-up time was 4.7 years with patients having regular visits
and upward titration of medication to reach a blood pressure goal of
less than 140/90 mmHg.
In
the overall LIFE trial, the results of the primary endpoint were
consistent across 23 of the 24 study subgroups examined. However,
additional analyses of the treatment effect by ethnicity suggested
that black patients treated with atenolol were at lower risk of
experiencing cardiovascular death and disease compared to patients
treated with losartan.
Did
You Know?
That
the statins that are prescribed for high LDL levels may also have an
anti-inflammatory effect and there’s evidence that type 2 may also
be an inflammatory disease. ADA
Poster # 982 showed that over 5 years, the concurrent use of a statin
was associated with an average 1.2 year delay in progression from oral
drugs to insulin therapy.