|
Item
#6
Diabetic
Hypertensives Benefit More From Losartan Than Atenolol
Losartan,
the angiotensin-II type-1 receptor antagonist, appears more
efficacious than the beta-blocker atenolol among hypertensive
diabetics.
"The general message to the practicing physician is that
hypertensive diabetic patients with LVH benefit more from losartan
than atenolol," declares Dr Lars Hjalmar Lindholm, Department
of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Umea,
Sweden. He is lead author of the European and North American
collaborators in this study as part of the ongoing Losartan
Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) study.
Diabetes mellitus doubles the risk of cardiovascular disease, even
in patients with hypertension who are already at high risk because
of their high blood pressure. A combination of hypertension and
diabetes accounts for a large proportion of cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality, the clinicians point out.
Frequency of diabetes mellitus is increasing rapidly worldwide,
yet it is still not clear what is the most suitable
antihypertensive drug to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease
in patients with hypertension and diabetes.
The LIFE study, although designed as a trial in patients with
hypertension and LVH, was also a correctly randomized study with
respect to the pre-specified subgroup of patients with diabetes.
Dr Lindholm and colleagues found that losartan reduced the risk of
cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction by around
25 percent, the risk of cardiovascular death by 37 percent, and
reduced the risk of death from all causes by nearly 40 percent--
63 in the losartan group and 104 in the atenolol group.
Systolic blood pressure during the trial was not associated with
any change in risk of the primary composite endpoint. "Thus,
the greater cardiovascular protective effect of losartan than
atenolol could result from more pronounced blockade of the
detrimental effects of angiotensin II," the clinicians
declared.
Losartan was more effective than atenolol in reversing LVH, the
clinicians concluded. This is probable because of more complete
protection against angiotensin II with losartan, whether generated
by the circulating renin-angiotensin system or other mechanisms,
especially since angiotensin II is a myocardial growth factor and
an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Lancet
2002; 359: 1004-10. Summary: In those with diabetes, when taking Losartan there
was a
* 40% decrease in heart failure
* 39% decrease in death
* 37% decrease in cardiovascular mortality (mostly
stroke) compared to those treated with atenolol and had diabetes.
There were similar, but not as spectacular, improvements in those
who did not have diabetes. To date, all evidence suggests
that the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors can be duplicated
with ARBs like Losartan.
All patients taking Losartan had significantly decreased adverse
effects (side effects). The class of ARBs seems now to be
clearly reasonable to treat hypertension in the face of diabetes,
rather than the ACE inhibitors.
Losartan has one unique feature not shared by the other ARBs - it
is uricosuric. This means that uric acid, the material that
causes gout, goes out of the kidney at a greater rate, preventing
gout. All patients had significantly decreased blood levels
of uric acid. Not a bad thing when you consider that other
drugs, such as thiazides that increase uric acid, might be used in
these patients too.
================================
FACT:
Since
1980, deaths related to diabetes increased 40 percent while
government funding for diabetes research at NIH dropped 20 percent
================================
ADVERTISEMENT:
ADA Releases New Dietary Guidelines
The new guidelines support the view that the total amount of
carbohydrates consumed in meals and snacks is important in
diabetes control, not the source of the carbohydrates. The
guidelines emphasize weight loss and physical activity and
focus on individualized dietary plans based on lifestyle,
diabetes management goals and other lifestyle factors.
Click Here For More Information!
Back / Next Item
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|