I’m talking about infections. Infections can be caused by bacteria, viruses,
fungi, or other pathogens, and patients with diabetes are more prone to a whole
slew of them. Some of these infections are rare and potentially lethal, like
mucormycosis, which almost never affects people without diabetes. Others are
more common, like athlete’s foot, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections.
While anyone can come down with these conditions, folks with diabetes are more
likely than those with normal blood sugar to be affected. Furthermore, the complications
of those infections can be much more severe in people with diabetes, and can
be more difficult to treat.
Take urinary tract infections, for example. Women with diabetes are about two
to three times more likely to have bacteria in their bladders than women without
diabetes (interestingly, the same does not appear to be true for men). There
also seems to be an increased risk of the infection spreading upwards into the
kidneys in diabetic patients, and diabetic women with urinary tract infections
are also more likely to require hospitalization than non-diabetic women.
Why is this the case? Well, diabetes affects many systems that protect against
infection in general, and against urinary tract infections specifically. Poor
circulation in diabetes reduces the ability of infection-fighting white blood
cells to get where they need to go. When they do get there, they are less able
to ingest the offending bacteria and kill them than normal white blood cells.
Many people with diabetes also have dysfunctional bladders that contract poorly;
this allows urine to remain in static pools for long periods of time, providing
luxurious ponds for bacteria to grow in.
Because of this propensity for serious infections of the bladder and kidneys,
there is a school of thought that recommends screening for and treating asymptomatic
bladder infections in diabetic women. Asymptomatic bladder infections occur
when bacteria are found in the bladder by doing a urine culture, even though
the woman has no symptoms and is unaware of their presence. The logic here is
that these bacteria are likely to be biding their time before causing more serious
mischief, and a pre-emptive strike would benefit patients by preventing more
dangerous infections later.
This idea is not confined to people with diabetes. At present we look for and
treat asymptomatic bladder infections in pregnant women and in patients about
to have surgery on their bladders or kidneys. On the other hand, there are studies
showing that this “screen and treat” approach does no measurable
good in other groups of patients prone to urinary tract infections, such as
those with spinal cord injuries, or elderly folks in nursing homes.
A new study now shows that the “screen and treat” strategy is not
worthwhile in women with diabetes. Researchers in Canada took a little over
a hundred women with diabetes (80% had type 2 diabetes) who had two positive
urine cultures but no symptoms of a urinary tract infection. They split the
women into two groups, one that received standard antibiotic therapy, while
the other got a placebo. Not surprisingly, taking the antibiotic was found to
clear the urine of bacteria in the majority of women. Over the next two years,
however, both groups had the same rates of symptomatic urinary tract infection
and hospitalization. Antibiotic therapy was unable even to delay the onset of
the next episode of symptomatic urinary tract infection.
Screening and treating hundreds of thousand of diabetic women each year for
asymptomatic bladder infections would cost an awful lot of money, and this new
study makes it clear that it’s not worth the expense. Furthermore, given
the rise of drug-resistant strains of bacteria, there is even more incentive
to cut back on unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. On the down side, women
with diabetes will continue to be at increased risk of serious urinary tract
infection relative to non-diabetic women, and we find ourselves no closer to
closing the gap.
Reference:
Harding, Godfrey K.M., Zhanel, George G., Nicolle, Lindsay E., Cheang, Mary,
the Manitoba Diabetes Urinary Tract Infection Study Group, Antimicrobial Treatment
in Diabetic Women with Asymptomatic Bacteriuria. New England Journal of Medicine
2002 347: 1576-1583 |