Sign up for our FREE Weekly Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issue
News and Information for Medical Professionals
Search Diabetes In Control
 
 
Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home Previous | Next
This article originally posted 23 June, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 474
Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Two-Fold Increase in Diabetes
People who use artificial sweeteners are heavier, more likely to have diabetes, and more likely to be insulin-resistant compared with nonusers.
Results show an inverse association between obesity and diabetes, on one side, and daily total caloric, carbohydrate, and fat intake, on the other side, when comparing artificial sweetener users and control subjects.

The association may reflect the increased use of artificial sweeteners by obese and/or diabetic study participants. "This is a cross-section study, so there are limitations — we cannot say that artificial sweetener use causes obesity, we can say it is associated with it," stated first author Kristofer S. Gravenstein, a postbaccalaureate researcher with the Clinical Research Branch at the National Institute of Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Artificial sweeteners activate sweet taste receptors in enteroendocrine cells, leading to the release of incretin, which is known to contribute to glucose absorption. Recent epidemiologic studies in Circulation (2008;117:754-761) and Obesity (2008;16:1894-1900) showed an association between diet soda consumption and the development of obesity and metabolic syndrome.

This report tested whether participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), which began in 1958, differ in anthropometric measures, daily caloric intake, and glucose status, separating them into three different groups: artificial sweetener users, artificial sweetener nonusers, or controls.

A total of 1,257 participants, with a mean age of 64.8 years (range, 21 - 96 years), had data on self-reported 7-day dietary intake, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and anthropometric measures. The major artificial sweetener consumed was aspartame, preferred by 66% of BLSA participants, followed by saccharin (13%), sucralose (1.0%), and combinations of the three (21%).

"In our study, we were actually able to isolate what type of sweetener was used at a certain point in time, as we used food diaries, and not food questionnaires."

"When we first did this analysis, we found that people ate more fat before 1983, which is the year [of] a big increase in artificial sweetener consumption in the American population — it was actually when aspartame was approved and diet Coke was introduced," he explained.

As a result, the study further analyzed data from a subset of participants, starting in 1983. Compared with 550 people who did not use artificial sweeteners, the 443 people who did were younger, heavier, and had a higher body mass index (BMI), yet they did not consume more calories from people who did not use artificial sweeteners. Fat, carbohydrate, protein, and total caloric intake were not different between the two groups (users vs nonusers).

Furthermore, Mr. Gravenstein noted that people who used artificial sweeteners "were less likely to have a normal OGTT, or they were less likely to be diagnosed as having a normal glucose homeostasis."

In terms of glucose status (the impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG)) the data show that artificial sweetener users "were not different than the prediabetics, i.e., they had the same prevalence of prediabetes," he said, adding that "in our population, people who used artificial sweeteners were twice as likely to have diabetes, 8.8% compared to 4.4% for controls."

Analyzing the data further, the investigators focused on a subpopulation, in which fasting insulin values were available from 374 nonusers and 311 artificial sweetener users. The users had a higher fasting glucose levels, higher fasting insulin levels, and a higher measure of insulin resistance, as measured by the homeostasis model assessment, but glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels were similar between the two groups.

The researchers suggest an alternative hypothesis, that artificial sweeteners modulate the metabolic rate through enteroendocrine cells, therefore contributing to the development of diabetes and/or obesity. However, this hypothesis needs further testing in longitudinal analysis and intervention studies, said the investigators.

"Also, it could be that artificial sweeteners are causing diabetes, or it could be that there is a higher use of them because a lot of physicians actually recommend people to use artificial sweeteners to prevent diabetes" Mr. Gravenstein said. The researchers are planning to address this question with a prospective analysis.

Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Endocrine Society: Abstract P2-478. Presented June 11, 2009

 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 23 June, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 474

Past five issues: Issue 495 | Issue 494 | Issue 493 | Issue 492 | Issue 491 |

Recent Most Read Articles:

Obesity Reduces Survival By 2 Years
Posted March 31, 2009
Not Enough Sleep Causes More Eating and Diabetes Risk
Posted May 01, 2009
Test Your Knowledge Issue 469
Posted May 19, 2009
Generex Biotechnology Announces Successful Phase III Study Data for Generex Oral-lyn(tm)
Posted March 17, 2009
Test Your Knowledge Issue 457
Posted February 24, 2009
Discovery of a New Receptor Antagonist Predicts Diabetes 2 Onset
Posted April 18, 2009
Letter From The Editor. June 29, 2009 Issue #475
Posted June 29, 2009
Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Two-Fold Increase in Diabetes
Posted June 23, 2009
Lantus Insulin: A Possible Link with Cancer - Requires Further Investigation
Posted June 29, 2009
New Buccal Insulin Approved by the FDA but with Conditions
Posted September 12, 2009

See more most read...


Enhancing physiology; Mechanism targets 2 key defects: insulin release and hepatic glucose production. Click here to learn more.




Browse by Feature Writer & Article Category.
A. Lee Dellon, MD | Beverly Price | Charles W Martin, DD | Derek Lowe, PhD | Dr. Bernstein | Dr. Brian Jakes, Jr. | Dr. Fred Pescatore | Dr. Tom Burke, Ph.D | Eric S. Freedland | Evan D. Rosen | Ginger Kanzer-Lewis | Kristina Sandstedt | Laura Plunkett | Leonard Lipson, M.A. | Marilyn Porter, RD, CDE | Melissa Diane Smith | Paul Chous, M.A., OD | Philip A. Wood PhD | Sheri R. Colberg PhD | Sherri Shafer | Steve Pohlit | Steven V. Edelman, M.D. | Timothy S. Hollingshead | Did You Know | Education | Facts | Feature | Items for the Week | New Products | Newsflash | Press Releases | Studies | Test Your Knowledge | Test Your Knowledge Answers | Tools |

Diabetes In Control Advertisers

Print This Week's Newsletter
Download This Week's Newsletter
Newsletter is in Adobe format
If you don't haveAdobe Acrobat Reader , you can download it for Free here .

Free CE Available
CE Programs On Diabetes Available here

Search Articles On Diabetes In Control
Sign up for our FREE Weekly Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issue
Privacy / Advertising With Us / Contact Us
Add us to your favorite news reader
DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is independent of the views of our advertisers and sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.