Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 09 September, 2008 and appeared in  Issue 433

New Analysis Shows Lower Not Necessarily Better When It Comes to BP

New observational analysis of the ONTARGET study shows that lower is not necessarily better when it comes to blood pressure in this patient population, with coronary heart disease or diabetes plus additional risk factors. Although there was evidence that lower was better in terms of stroke, there was a suggestion of harm when BP was reduced below 130 mm Hg systolic for the outcome of cardiovascular death in diabetics. The findings suggest that in high-risk people, the [current] guidelines of 'the lower, the better' may not apply.
Advertisement

Dr Peter Sleight (Oxford, UK) stressed that these observational data have limitations and that the ONTARGET population was not a typical hypertension-trial cohort. The 25 260 patients were elderly and were at high risk, but their blood pressure was not particularly high (high-normal or stage 1 hypertension), and they were already well-treated before they entered the study.

"The findings suggest that in high-risk people, the [current] guidelines of 'the lower, the better' may not apply," he noted.Study discussant Dr Frank T Ruschitzka (University of Zurich, Switzerland) said that the "treasure box" that is ONTARGET has already shown that the combination of the ACE inhibitor ramipril and the angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) telmisartan (Micardis, Boehringer Ingelheim)--despite lowering blood pressure more than either drug alone--"fails to translate into clinical benefit." He added that recent findings from the secondary-prevention stroke trial, PROFESS, where telmisartan was pitted against placebo, show that the ARB "does not prevent recurrent strokes." These new findings from the blood-pressure analysis of ONTARGET "show that we should certainly not go too low," he concluded.

"Puzzling" Findings; Diabetics at Risk of CV Death With Lower BP

The landmark ONTARGET trial showed that telmisartan was "noninferior" to ramipril in 25 260 patients with coronary heart disease or diabetes plus additional risk factors who were over the age of 55 years of age but did not have evidence of heart failure. And the combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit.

The average BP on study entry was 142/82 mm Hg, and patients were randomized to receive ramipril 10 mg per day, telmisartan 80 mg a day, or the combination of the two. The mean duration of follow-up of the study was 55 months.

Results showed that mean blood pressure was lower in the telmisartan (a 0.9/0.6-mm-Hg-greater reduction) and the combination-therapy (a 2.4/1.4-mm-Hg-greater reduction) groups than in the ramipril group. In the new analysis, Sleight said the 25 260 patients were divided into four quartiles based upon blood pressure, regardless of which study arm they had been randomized to. The analysis showed that only the very highest quartile of BP (systolic BP >154 mm Hg) had a significantly higher risk of the primary end point: cardiovascular death, stroke, MI, or heart-failure hospitalization (p<0.001). When the end points were considered separately, there were no differences between the four BP quartiles for cardiovascular death or for MI, "which some may say is puzzling, as lowering blood pressure doesn't seem to do anything,"

Sleight noted.There was a benefit to lowering blood pressure in terms of stroke, however. Those in the lowest quartile of BP (systolic <130 mm Hg) had significantly less risk of stroke than those in the highest quartile. But there was also evidence of potential harm among diabetics: although those with diabetes in the highest quartile of blood pressure did have a higher risk of the primary outcome, when it came to cardiovascular death alone, those in the lowest quartile seemed to have an increased risk of death, Sleight said.

Ruschitzka concluded that these findings and others "put a little bit of a cloud over the class of sartans." The overwhelming message from ONTARGET in terms of BP, he said, was that "ACE inhibitors or calcium channel blockers [CCBs] come first, and I'm not so sure about the sartans anymore." Also, "don't go below 140/90 mm Hg in this type of patient," and if more BP lowering is needed on top of ACE inhibitors and CCBs, a beta blocker should be use.

European Society of Cardiology 2008 Congress

======================================

DID YOU KNOW:
Initial Weight Loss After Type 2 Diagnosis Doubles Positive Outcomes:  People who lose weight soon after a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes have better control of their blood pressure and blood sugar and are more likely to maintain that control even if they regain their weigh. This is the first clinical study to show that benefits remain even if patients regain their weight. The study followed more than 2,500 adults with type 2 diabetes for 4 years. Those who lost weight within an average of 18 months after diagnosis were up to twice as likely to achieve their blood pressure and blood sugar targets as those who didn't lose weight. Those benefits can prevent diabetes-related heart disease, blindness, nerve and kidney damage, and death. Diabetes Care, Aug 2008

===============================

Help us keep this newsletter free-update your profile. http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/surveys/index.php

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 09 September, 2008 and appeared in  Issue 433

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 69 | Issue 611 | Issue 610 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 68 | Issue 609 |

 
Diabetes In Control Advertisers
 
 
Cast Your Vote
Do your type 2 patients not on insulin count their carbs and report back to you?

Navigate Diabetes In Control



Search Articles On Diabetes In Control