Sign up for our FREE Weekly Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issue
News and Information for Medical Professionals
Search Diabetes In Control
 
 
Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home Previous | Next
This article originally posted 14 August, 2007 and appeared in  Issue 377
Secondary Failure of Glucose Control With Metformin, Sulfonylurea, or TZD’s Monotherapy
Which drugs are the ones to sustain good control, the longest?
The purpose of the study was to examine glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) values longitudinally in patients who newly started metformin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione monotherapy; in a subset of patients whose A1C values were 7% or greater before starting therapy (baseline) and who achieved A1C goal (A1C < 7%) during therapy, rates of secondary failure (i.e., A1C value returned to >/= 7% during therapy) were compared for each drug.

The study was a four-year retrospective analysis. An administrative database from a large health care plan was used  Patients who filled at least one prescription for metformin (5453 patients), sulfonylurea (2373), and thiazolidinedione (1590) therapy, respectively, between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2004, were enrolled. Measurements included patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, baseline A1C values, changes in A1C values (last available result during follow-up minus baseline value), and A1C values before and after the addition of an antidiabetic drug other than the index drug (therapy intensification) were documented. Mean age was 50.7 years; 5027 (53.4%) were men. Mean baseline A1C value was 8.4%, and about 70% of patients had an AIC value of 7% or greater before starting therapy. Mean follow-up was 1.9 years, and mean decrease in A1C values was 1.47% (to 6.91%).

The probabilities of attaining A1C goals were similar for patients receiving metformin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione therapy. The rate of therapy intensification among patients taking metformin (24.7%) was lower than that of patients taking a sulfonylurea (30.1%, p<0.001) but similar to that of those taking a thiazolidinedione (24.6%). Secondary failure occurred in 36.3% of patients; mean time from the start of therapy to its failure was about 1.51 years. Patients receiving a sulfonylurea were 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.50) times more likely than patients receiving metformin to experience secondary failure, whereas failure rates were similar for thiazolidinediones and metformin (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99).

From the results it was concluded that in the subset of patients assessed for secondary failure, although treatment initially reduced A1C values, more than one third experienced failure. Real-world studies of A1C goal attainment must follow patients on a long-term basis to assess the maintenance of glycemic control over time.
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Aug;27(8):1102-10.

===========================

Learn about the ONlY Instant Disposable In Office A1c Test:  Studies have shown that by providing the A1c test in the office while the patient is present, can lower A1c by a full point.  Learn about the only 99% accurate disposable A1c test that is CLIA waived and cost less then 10 dollars and reimbursed at least 21 dollars.    
http://www.a1ctest.com

===========================

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO UPDATE YOUR PROFILE!!!
http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/surveys/index.php

 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 14 August, 2007 and appeared in  Issue 377

Past five issues: Issue 495 | Issue 494 | Issue 493 | Issue 492 | Issue 491 |

Diabetes In Control Advertisers

Print This Week's Newsletter
Download This Week's Newsletter
Newsletter is in Adobe format
If you don't haveAdobe Acrobat Reader , you can download it for Free here .

Free CE Available
CE Programs On Diabetes Available here



Text Advertisement


Search Articles On Diabetes In Control
Sign up for our FREE Weekly Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issue
Privacy / Advertising With Us / Contact Us
Add us to your favorite news reader
DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is independent of the views of our advertisers and sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.