Sign up for our FREE Weekly Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issue
News and Information for Medical Professionals
Search Diabetes In Control
 
 
Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home Previous | Next
This article originally posted 08 May, 2007 and appeared in  Issue 363
Noninvasive Type 2 Diabetes Screening More Sensitive Than Standard Tests
Spectroscopic measurement of dermal advanced glycation end products (AGEs) is a more effective and noninvasive technology for prediabetes and diabetes screening compared with fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (A1c) tests, according to the results of a study published in the May issue of Diabetes Care.
"This study compared the performance of a novel noninvasive technology to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and A1C tests for detecting undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance," write John D. Maynard, MS, from VeraLight in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and colleagues. "Current screening methods for type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes are inadequate due to their inconvenience and inaccuracy.... A more accurate and convenient screening method could dramatically improve early detection of type 2 diabetes and its precursors, facilitating interventions that can prevent or at least delay the development of type 2 diabetes and its related micro- and macrovascular complications."

Elevated skin AGEs are biomarkers of diabetes, are highly correlated with the complications of diabetes, and predict future diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy. Individuals with diabetes accumulate skin AGEs faster than do individuals with normal glucose regulation. Until the recent development of novel noninvasive technology to measure AGEs, a punch biopsy was needed to quantify skin AGE levels. Spectroscopic measurement of dermal AGEs (SAGE) measures skin fluorescence caused by AGEs and provides a quantitative diabetes risk score. It does not require fasting, creates no biohazards, automatically compensates for subject-specific skin differences, and provides an immediate result.

This head-to-head evaluation in a naive population of 351 subjects compared results from FPG and A1C tests with results from testing with a noninvasive device that detects the fluorescence of skin AGEs.

The positive screening class was defined as subjects with 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) values of 140 mg/dL or greater (n = 84; prevalence, 23.9%). The performances of the noninvasive device, FPG, and A1C were evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using the OGTT results as the gold standard.

At the impaired fasting glucose threshold of FPG of 100 mg/dL, sensitivity of FPG was 58% and specificity was 77.4%. At that same specificity, the sensitivity for A1C testing was 63.8%, whereas the noninvasive testing sensitivity was 74.7%. The increase in sensitivity of the noninvasive device compared with both blood tests for detecting diabetes and prediabetes was statistically significant (P < .05).

"The noninvasive technology showed clinical performance advantages over both FPG and A1C testing," the authors write. "The sensitivity differential indicated that the noninvasive device is capable of identifying 28.8% more individuals in the OGTT-defined positive screening class than FPG testing and 17.1% more than A1C testing. The combination of higher sensitivity and greater convenience — rapid results with no fasting or blood draws — makes the device well suited for opportunistic screening."

Practice Pearls

  • The SAGE technique is a noninvasive measure of skin fluorescence to detect glycation end products associated with diabetes risk.
  • The sensitivity of the SAGE technique is higher than that of FPG and A1c for detection of type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.

Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1120-1124.

===========================

Advertisement
For the diabetic patient, it's not the cholesterol that's the problem. It's the number of LDL particles, especially small LDL particles. To see the real risk, use the NMR LipoProfile(r) test, the only test that directly measures the number of LDL particles and the number of small LDL particles - the particles shown to be more predictive of CHD events than LDL-C. Click here to learn more.

 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 08 May, 2007 and appeared in  Issue 363

Past five issues: Issue 495 | Issue 494 | Issue 493 | Issue 492 | Issue 491 |

Diabetes In Control Advertisers

Print This Week's Newsletter
Download This Week's Newsletter
Newsletter is in Adobe format
If you don't haveAdobe Acrobat Reader , you can download it for Free here .

Free CE Available
CE Programs On Diabetes Available here



Text Advertisement


Search Articles On Diabetes In Control
Sign up for our FREE Weekly Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issue
Privacy / Advertising With Us / Contact Us
Add us to your favorite news reader
DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is independent of the views of our advertisers and sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.