|
In one of the most rigorous studies ever conducted to determine how well people
comprehend the information provided on food nutrition labels, researchers have
found that the reading and math skills of a significant number of people may
not be sufficient to extract the needed information.
Using standardized and validated tests for literacy and numeracy, researchers
from Vanderbilt University Medical Center surveyed 200 primary care patients
from a wide socioeconomic range. A Nutrition Label Survey (NLS), designed with
input from registered dietitians, primary care providers, and experts in health
literacy/numeracy to evaluate patient understanding of current nutrition labels,
was used to measure comprehension of current food nutrition labels. One part
of the NLS asked subjects to interpret food labels, such as determining carbohydrate
or caloric content of an amount of food consumed. The other part asked patients
to choose which of two foods had more or less of a certain nutrient, giving
patients a 50/50 chance to guess the correct food item. Also, half of the survey
questions involved products that were clearly labeled on their package as “reduced
carb,” “low carb,” or designed for “a low-carb diet.”
Sixty-eight percent of patients had at least some college education, and 77%
had at least 9th-grade level literacy skills. However, 63% of patients had less
than 9th-grade numeracy skills. Over 40% had a chronic illness for which specific
dietary intervention is important (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), and 23% reported
being on a specific diet plan. Most patients reported using food labels and
found labels easy to understand.
Overall, patients correctly answered 69% (SD 21%) of the NLS questions. For
example, only 32% of patients could correctly calculate the amount of carbohydrates
consumed in a 20-ounce bottle of soda that had 2.5 servings in the bottle. Only
60% of patients could calculate the number of carbohydrates consumed if they
ate half a bagel, when the serving size was a whole bagel. Only 22% of patients
could determine the amount of net carbohydrates in 2 slices of low-carb bread,
and only 23% could determine the amount of net carbohydrates in a serving of
low-carb spaghetti. Common reasons for incorrect responses included misapplication
of the serving size, confusion by extraneous material on the food label, and
incorrect calculations.
According to Russell L. Rothman, MD MPP, “The study showed that many
patients struggle to understand current food labels, and that this can be particularly
challenging for patients with poor literacy and numeracy (math) skills. Poor
understanding of nutrition labels can make it difficult for patients to follow
a good diet. Of particular concern are situations that involve interpretation
and application of serving size. There are many opportunities for health care
providers to improve how they talk to patients about using food labels and following
diets. There are also opportunities for the FDA to improve how food labels are
designed in order to improve how patients take care of their nutrition.
The article is “Patient Understanding of Food Labels: The Role of Literacy
and Numeracy” by Russell L. Rothman, MD MPP, Ryan Housam, BS, Hilary Weiss,
BS, Dianne Davis, RD CDE, Rebecca Gregory, MS RD CDE, Tebeb Gebretsadik MPH,
Ayumi Shintani, PHD MPH, and Tom A. Elasy, MD MPH.
The article appears in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
Volume 31, Issue 5 (November 2006)
Full text of the article is available upon request
================================
Dr. Bernstein will be doing another live teleconference call soon.
If you would like to ask a question or just register for the free teleconference
call, just go to http://www.askdrbernstein.com
and register. There were over 600 people on the last call. More info at http://www.diabetes911.net
|