Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 06 June, 2013 and appeared in  DietObesityIssue 680

Artificial Sweeteners May Affect Blood Glucose Levels and Insulin Response

Sucralose, the artificial sweetener of Splenda®, was found to have an effect on the absorption of glucose and subsequent insulin secretion in non-diabetic, obese individuals....

Advertisement

M. Yanina Pepino, PhD, and colleagues out of Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, began looking at non-nutritive sweeteners such as Splenda® (sucralose) and the metabolic response following its ingestion. Previous studies have indicated metabolic effects in animal models but the actual effects of these sweeteners in people still remain uncertain.

Generally, artificial sweeteners were thought to have no effect on our metabolism nor increase the calorie intake making them a perfect substitute for sugar in diet products. Added in small amounts to our food, these artificial sweeteners interact with receptors on the tongue to provide that same sweet sensation as sugar. However, it has been noted that in animals, these artificial sweeteners bind to similar receptors in the mouth as those found along the GI tract and in the pancreas leading to insulin release and glucose absorption.

To better understand the potential effects of non-nutritive sweeteners in humans, Pepino's research group studied the effects on hormones and glucose of sucralose use in 17 morbidly obese, insulin sensitive individuals who have no prior use of the food additive. Using a randomized crossover design, researchers conducted a 5-hour modified oral glucose tolerance test upon two separate occasions. Patients either consumed sucralose or water 10 minutes prior to the first glucose administration. Prior to the second glucose administration, each patient drank the opposite of what they had in the first test.

In consideration of the study population, Pepino said, "Most of the studies of artificial sweeteners have been conducted in healthy, lean individuals…We wanted to study this population because these sweeteners frequently are recommended to them as a way to make their diets healthier by limiting calorie intake."

The authors reported a greater effect on the body's hormones and glucose regulation with the ingestion of sucralose compared to water. They also reported a greater incremental increase in peak plasma glucose levels followed by an average of 20% greater insulin secretion in patients who ingested sucralose. Following ingestion of sucralose, an average of 7% decrease in insulin clearance and a 23% decrease in insulin sensitivity was noted compared to water. The authors did not detect any significant differences between the effects of sucralose or water on glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide or glucagon incremental AUC.

The authors concluded, "Our results indicate that this artificial sweetener is not inert -- it does have an effect." In regards to the clinical importance of their findings, Pepino said, "What these all mean for daily life scenarios is still unknown, but our findings are stressing the need for more studies…Whether these acute effects of sucralose will influence how our bodies handle sugar in the long term is something we need to know."

M. Y. Pepino, C. D. Tiemann, B. W. Patterson, B. M. Wice, S. Klein. Sucralose Affects Glycemic and Hormonal Responses to an Oral Glucose Load. Diabetes Care, 2013; DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2221 

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 06 June, 2013 and appeared in  DietObesityIssue 680

Past five issues: SGLT-2 Inhibitors Special Edition April 2014 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 184 | Issue 724 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 183 | Issue 723 |

2014 Most Popular Articles:

Patient Handout: 7 Tips to Drop Excess Pounds with Diabetes
Posted April 04, 2014
Who Qualifies for Statin Treatment under the New Guidelines?
Posted March 27, 2014
Vitamin D's Effect on the Progression of Pre-type 1 Diabetes
Posted March 14, 2014
Updated Bolus Calculators for Diabetes Management
Posted March 20, 2014
A1C Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes Following Noncardiac Surgery
Posted March 14, 2014
Surprising Trends in the Use of Antidiabetic Drugs
Posted March 27, 2014
Abdominal Fat Accumulation Prevented by Unsaturated Fat
Posted March 14, 2014
Evidence Shows Possible Benefit of Metformin and Glyburide Use in Pregnancy
Posted March 14, 2014
Statin Side-effects Questioned
Posted March 20, 2014
Agavins: A Potential Alternative to Artificial Sweeteners
Posted March 27, 2014

See more most popular…


Browse by Feature Writer & Article Category.
A. Lee Dellon, MD | Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD, FCP, MACP | Beverly Price | Charles W Martin, DD | Derek Lowe, PhD | Dr. Bernstein | Dr. Brian Jakes, Jr. | Dr. Fred Pescatore | Dr. Tom Burke, Ph.D | Eric S. Freedland | Evan D. Rosen | Ginger Kanzer-Lewis | Greg Milliger | Kristina Sandstedt | Laura Plunkett | Leonard Lipson, M.A. | Louis H. Philipson | Maria Emanuel Ryan, DDS, PhD | Marilyn Porter, RD, CDE | Melissa Diane Smith | Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, ScD, FASHP | Paul Chous, M.A., OD | Philip A. Wood PhD | R. Keith Campbell, Professor, B.Pharm, MBA, CDE | Sheri R. Colberg PhD | Sherri Shafer | Stanley Schwartz, MD, FACP, FACE | Steve Pohlit | Steven V. Edelman, M.D. | Timothy S. Hollingshead |
Advertisement

Cast Your Vote
Was the data release from CMS on Medicare payments a good idea?
CME/CE of the Week
Greet Van den Berghe, MD, PhD

Category: General Diabetes
Credits: 1.0
Search Articles On Diabetes In Control