Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted and appeared in  PreventionPractice MgmtPublic HealthIssue 647

Diabetes Screening May Not Reduce Death Rates

Without the knowledge of what to do once diagnosed, nothing really happens....
Advertisement

Researchers looked at the number of deaths over 10 years among more than 20,000 people, aged 40 to 69. All of them were at high risk for diabetes.

The patients were divided into three groups. One group underwent a round of diabetes screening that was followed up by routine care for those diagnosed with diabetes; another group had a round of screening followed by intensive management for those diagnosed with diabetes; and a third group did not undergo diabetes screening.

Over an average follow-up of nearly 10 years, the overall death rates in the groups that had diabetes screening were no lower than in the group that had no screening. There also was no significant difference between the groups in the number of deaths specifically from diabetes, cardiovascular illness, cancer or other causes.

Study author Dr. Simon Griffin, of the epidemiology unit at Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge, said in a journal news release, "It seems that the benefits of screening might be smaller than expected and restricted to individuals with detectable disease." "However, benefits to the population could be increased by including the detection and management of cardiovascular risk factors alongside the assessment of diabetes risk, performing repeated rounds of screening and improving strategies to maximize the uptake of screening."

Michael Engelgau, of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, wrote in an accompanying editorial, "Diabetes screening and diagnosis can be done with relative ease, which further escalates popular support for wide-scale screening." "However, these compelling arguments overlook the screening costs, potential harm and lack of clear evidence that screening improves health outcomes compared with current routine clinical diagnosis."

"This study increases the doubt about the value of wide-scale screening for undiagnosed diabetes alone, and deserves credit for tackling the screening quandary head-on," Engelgau concluded. "Nevertheless, for any one study to address the diverse factors that affect screening policies -- ranging from the magnitude of population burden of disease to the capacity and effectiveness of prevention approaches -- is a tall order. Screening recommendations are therefore likely to be country specific and context specific for the foreseeable future."

The Lancet, news release, Oct. 3, 2012  

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 12 October, 2012 and appeared in  PreventionPractice MgmtPublic HealthIssue 647

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 252 | SGLT-2 Inhibitors Special Edition July 2015 | Issue 792 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 251 | Issue 791 |

2015 Most Popular Articles:

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: The Patient's Perspective
Posted July 10, 2015
The Impact of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists on Weight Reduction
Posted July 10, 2015
Vitamin D3 Supplementation and Weight Loss Prevent Cancer in Older Women
Posted July 10, 2015
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Reduce Bone Loss During Weight Loss
Posted July 17, 2015
Diet That Mimics Fasting Appears to Slow Aging
Posted July 03, 2015
Impact of Exercise in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
Posted July 23, 2015
Metformin May Increase Mortality in Advanced CKD among Type 2 Patients
Posted July 10, 2015
Evaluation of Cellphone Application that Records Readings from Glucometer
Posted July 10, 2015
Ancestral Diets Can Determine Vulnerability to Type 2 Diabetes
Posted July 17, 2015
Bromocriptine for High Dose Insulin Therapy Type 2 Patients
Posted July 23, 2015


Browse by Feature Writer & Article Category.
A. Lee Dellon, MD | Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD, FCP, MACP | Beverly Price | Charles W Martin, DD | Derek Lowe, PhD | Dr. Brian Jakes, Jr. | Dr. Fred Pescatore | Dr. Tom Burke, Ph.D | Eric S. Freedland | Evan D. Rosen | Ginger Kanzer-Lewis | Greg Milliger | Kristina Sandstedt | Laura Plunkett | Leonard Lipson, M.A. | Louis H. Philipson | Maria Emanuel Ryan, DDS, PhD | Marilyn Porter, RD, CDE | Melissa Diane Smith | Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, ScD, FASHP | Paul Chous, M.A., OD | Philip A. Wood PhD | R. Keith Campbell, Professor, B.Pharm, MBA, CDE | Richard K. Bernstein, MD | Sheri R. Colberg PhD | Sherri Shafer | Stanley Schwartz, MD, FACP, FACE | Steve Pohlit | Steven V. Edelman, M.D. | Timothy S. Hollingshead |

Cast Your Vote
Do you have any patients on a dual therapy of a DPP-4 and a SGLT-2 who have reached their goal A1c?

CME/CE of the Week
Hugh G. Calkins, MD, and Joseph Edward Marine, MD

Category: Cardiology
Credits:
 1