This article originally posted 03 May, 2002 and appeared in
Allergies
Insulin and other Allergic Reactions
Does Diabetes make a Difference?
Advertisement
There are various types of allergic reactions that we will examine, some of
which can have a very profound effect on blood glucose control. The one that
can be considered to be part of the normal pathogenesis of diabetes, although
not common due to the uses of human DNA insulin, is an allergy to injected insulin.[i]
These occurrences have been declining as beef and pork insulins are being replaced.[ii]
[iii] Nevertheless this can be a serious problem to those that develop this
allergy. Difficulties in blood sugar control and increasing insulin dosages,
which progress far more rapidly than the normal pathology of the disease, may
be the first symptoms. This may also be accompanied by local injection site
irritation with the development of wheals.[iv] Even with some or all of these
symptoms present, this condition may still be dismissed by doctors as an expected
part of the disease process. While all these suspicions can easily be verified
by blood testing for an increase in anti-insulin antibodies, it may take several
detours before you arrive at that point. Some of the clues that will lead to
this conclusion might be revealed in more common blood testing. A typical complete
blood count (CBC) would likely show a definite increase in eosinophil cells,
which could denote an allergic response. This result would probably be followed
by another blood test for immunoglobulin E (IgE). There are five basic classes
of immunoglobulins (IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and IgM), and a number of different subclasses.
They function as specific systemic antibodies in the blood and other body fluids.
An elevated IgE value would be a very significant, but not necessarily an inclusive
indication of an allergic condition even though it can coincide with an insulin
allergy.[v] [vi] Nevertheless, a high value would prompt more investigation,
which could lead to allergic testing of a variety of possible allergens. This
is when a test for anti-insulin antibodies or specific IgE anti-insulin antibodies
should not be overlooked.[vii] There is a common elevation in these values from
the uses of injected insulin, but this count will usually be much higher when
experiencing this allergy.[viii] [ix] Also, it appears that when anti-insulin
antibodies are present to the type of insulin currently being used, they may
also be present to other insulins that may have never been used.[x] So, there
may be little value in trying to switch to anything other than human insulin,
which is the least immuno reactant. Please note that there is a distinct difference
between anti-insulin antibodies and auto anti-insulin antibodies. While anti-insulin
antibodies are an allergic reaction from injected insulin, auto anti-insulin
antibodies are generated from a spontaneous autoimmune response without the
interference of exogenous insulin.[xi] This autoimmune reaction is similar in
nature to the one that destroys the beta cells in Type I diabetes and it will
be discussed in the following chapter.
Now the question is what to do when you have been diagnosed with an anti-insulin
allergy? The conventional treatment approach is usually steroids, antihistamines
or desensitization therapy. But before you consider any of these therapies it
is very important that you conclude what you have is in fact an insulin allergy
and not some other related allergy masquerading as an insulin allergy.[xii]
Some of the more likely allergens can be the retarding agents used to slow the
absorption of insulin. The protamine used in the NPH preparations and the zinc
used in the Lente and Ultralente insulins might be at fault, but it appears
that a reaction to the protamine is much more common.[xiii] [xiv] The ratio
of those that react negatively with NPH insulin as compared with Lente insulins
can be as high as 5 to 1.[xv] The other possible reactants include protein impurities
or additives in the insulin itself or contaminants in some syringes.[xvi] There
have been reports of syringes and pen injectors, which use silicone in their
manufacture, causing injection site irritation and local reactions, but again
these situations are much less probable of being a cause as compared to NPH
insulin. If it is believed that one of the retarding agents is to blame you
can switch temporarily to the other or even switch the type of insulin.[xvii]
There are two types of synthetic human insulins, Humulin and Novolin. Humulin
is based on genetically altered bacteria, while Novolin is produced through
a similar process using modified brewers yeast. Although considered identical,
there are very subtle differences, which might not provoke an immune response.
In fact, the faster acting Humalog (Lispro) insulin shows to be less immuno
reactant than Regular insulin, even though they are virtually identical.[xviii]
If for any reason you try to replace Regular insulin with Humalog keep in mind
that about 30% more Humalog is needed to achieve comparable results of Regular
insulin. So, it appears that it may not require dramatic differences in the
structure of insulin to deceive the immune system. Sometimes a decrease in the
insulin dose alone is enough to correct this condition. Improvement in overall
control is not uncommon in some Type II diabetes patients, which reduce large
insulin doses. There are probably a number of Type I diabetes patients that
would fall into this same category but, their reduction needs to be monitored
much more closely. A 5% reduction of the total daily insulin dose would be the
best place to begin. I have seen escalating insulin doses create glucose control
problems that could only be solved by slowly reducing the insulin dose itself.
Even though this method of treatment sounds paradoxical, it often quite effective
in certain cases. I would suggest you use the different insulin(s) or doses
for no less than a week before making a decision on its effect, unless reasonable
glucose control can not be achieved. Other non-invasive treatments that might
be beneficial in this situation have been aspirin and vitamin C therapy. The
uses of aspirin has been quite successful in its ability to desensitize those
with an insulin allergy. One of the studies used 1300 mg of enteric coated aspirin
three times a day for a week, but found it necessary to continued the dose for
the protective effect.[xix] While aspirin is generally consider safe for adults
without gastric ulcers, there are still some safety concerns for its uses in
children due to the development of Ryes syndrome. Also, due to the very high
dose involved, this type of aspirin therapy should be approached very cautiously.
Vitamin C has been emerging as the one vitamin that has been proven to be beneficial
in virtually every aliment. It appears that large doses of vitamin C can be
helpful in the treatment of both allergies and autoimmune conditions.[xx] It
is not exactly clear how vitamin C works in these situations but, it may be
through some type antihistamine or anti-inflammatory action. The doses would
probably be in the order of ten to twenty thousand milligrams a day of vitamin
C for an indefinite period. If these treatments fail to resolve this problem
it may require the temporary uses of an antihistamine, corticosteroid or desensitization
therapy. The current process of insulin desensitization consists of continuous
subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).[xxi] [xxii] This is accomplished by slowly
increasing very small doses of insulin through injection or infusion on an hourly
basis. This treatment is usually very effective in treating an insulin allergy
and rarely is there ever need to repeat it, except in extreme cases.
There is a completely different aspect to allergies and how they pertain to
diabetes patients than what just has been discussed. I believe that this situation
is far more common and effects a large number of diabetes patients possibly
without them even knowing it. What I am referring to are environmental allergies
that may not exhibit any type of external symptoms normally associated with
allergies.[xxiii] The only visible indications that occur are elevated blood
sugar values, which may be either sporadic or continuous. These reactions are
more than likely caused by food but, they can just as easily be the result of
airborne allergens such as molds or pollens. Sometimes something as common as
a mosquito bite or insect sting can be to blame, especially in a child.[xxiv]
Actually, there are a wide variety of potential allergens that we all come in
contact with on a daily basis. The difference is however, how each of our body’s
own immune system responds to them. An allergic reaction can invoke local and
or systemic physiological response to varying severity. These are inflammatory
reactions, which can effect skin, breathing, blood pressure, blood sugar and
in severe cases cause anaphylactic shock.[xxv] In a non-diabetes patientwith
only minimal reactivity to a substance, an allergic reaction can go completely
unnoticed. This is because an uncompromised regulatory system can compensate
for these minor fluctuations. While in a diabetic, the inability to facilitate
these corrective actions due to a greater load on the endocrine system may only
result in hyperglycemia. These increased blood sugar values are often dismissed
as part of the normal difficulties of controlling a diabetic, but there is always
an explanation for hyperglycemia if you chose to find it. But if you are experiencing
continual blood sugar control problems and have ruled the amount of food, insulin
or oral hypoglycemics dose and hypoglycemic rebounds not to be the problem,
you must consider what else could be involved. Normal hormonal releases can
account for fair percentage of unexplained glucose spikes in Type I diabetes
patients and possibly some Type II diabetes patients. But above the normal basal
amounts of hormonal excretions, which should already be adjusted for in your
daily treatment, most hormonal spikes are transient. They can appear at any
time and usually last several days to a week and in some cases slightly longer.
So while hormone releases can be an annoying problem they should not be a chronic
one, except during puberty. When investigating a problem like this the next
logical place to examine are the things that come in constant exposure with
the person. This leads us back to food and environment. A food induced allergic
reaction could possibly raise blood sugar by elevating IgE and also by increasing
histamine levels.[xxvi] These reactions may translate into high postprandial
blood sugar reading or they can take place many hours from the time of consumption
making it difficult to determine the cause. A rotation or elimination diet might
be helpful in determining the exact culprit. Keep in mind while I use the term
food, it can be an additive in a particular type of food that is actually causing
the problem. There are literally thousands of different preservatives, colorings,
stabilizers, flavorings and antioxidants used in practically every kind of food,
any of which has the potential of causing a reaction.[xxvii] Dyes and colorants
have been notorious for causing allergic reactions. They have also been implicated
in the development of asthma and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD).[xxviii]
[xxix] Colorings like carmine (red E120), tartrazine (yellow No. 5), annatto
(orange-yellow) and some different shades of blue have been proven to provoke
allergic and asthmatic attacks.[xxx] [xxxi] [xxxii] [xxxiii] Also, some of these
dyes are actually derived from natural sources, so just because it is natural
does not make it hypoallergenic. Be aware that these dyes and flavorings have
also found their way into both prescription and over the counter drugs.[xxxiv]
Adverse reactions have also been reported from the ingestion of preservatives
like butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), nitrates,
and sulfites, and from benzoates and monosodium glutamate (MSG) additives.[xxxv]
[xxxvi]
The reason why some diabetes patients might be more prone to these allergies
than others may be due to a genetic predisposal. There may be a direct link
between food and pollen allergies and Type I diabetes. The first of these studies
suggest a connection between food allergies and autoimmune reactions like those
that are involved in the development of Type I diabetes.[xxxvii] It points to
a hypersensitivity to certain proteins in wheat, rye, barley and soy that may
act as trigging agents. Another study shows a possible relationship between
pollen and food allergies and specific human leukocyte antigens (HLA).[xxxviii]
The significance here is that some of the HLA’s, common in these allergies,
appear to be the same ones that might be linked to the development of Type I
diabetes. Other ways allergens can pose a problem is when they enter through
the nasal or respiratory tract. Usually this will invoke a defensive response
with the secretion of mucus. The constant filling of the nasal and sinus cavities
with mucus combined with elevated blood sugars of diabetes can create an ideal
environment for bacterial or fungal infections.[xxxix] [xl] Nasal allergy reactions
can also alter the function of the eustachian tubes, which can increase the
incidents of ear infections.[xli] If these types of infections reoccur frequently
they can development into a more chronic format. Chronic infections such as
these may not manifest any physical symptoms, nor will their effects necessarily
appear on routine blood tests. It may require more in depth blood testing or
a CT scan to locate the cause. Also, continually using antibiotics to combat
these infections can create the condition of antibiotic resistance. As an alternative
to antibiotics and if detected in time, immediate uses of the herb echinacea
might be able to curtail the infection.[xlii] [xliii] Echinacea is an extremely
safe and effective immune system stimulant, which demonstrates both antibacterial
and antiviral properties.[xliv] This makes echinacea work equally as well in
treating the cold and flu viruses.[xlv] Regardless of what pathologies were
involved in development of allergies the condition still must be addressed.
Avoidance is the best approach when possible, but it is not always practical
in every situation. Conventional treatments are the typical uses of drugs including
antihistamines, steroids, and of coarse the allergy shot. There are a wide variety
of alternative treatments available for allergies. When food allergies are under
investigation one of the first places to start is the digestion system. In some
cases decreased production of stomach acid (HCL) or digestive enzymes can cause
incomplete digestion of food that might get released into the bloodstream resulting
in a reaction.[xlvi] If this condition is diagnosed an oral digestive supplement
should be helpful. The uses of probiotics, such as various types of lactobacillus,
has been successful in treating imbalances in intestinal flora that could lead
to allergic reactions.[xlvii] There are a host of herbs used like feverfew,
triphala and goldenseal, just to name a few, to treat allergies but, it is better
to identify the particular allergen first to make a more specific herb selection
to achieve the desired effect.[xlviii] Other treatments like high dose vitamin
C and pollen immunotherapy have proven beneficial in reducing allergic reactions.[xlix]
[l] One of the most remarkable therapies I have seen in the treatment of allergies
is the Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique or NAET. Dr. Devi Nambudripad
created a unique treatment that is able to completely eliminate allergies non-invasively.
NAET utilizes several other disciplines; kinesiology, chiropractic, acupuncture
and acupressure. The treatment begins with muscle testing with specific allergens,
then through in uses of primarily acupressure techniques at certain acupuncture
points each allergen is addressed and its effect nullified. The patient has
to remain free from exposure to this allergen for 24 hours for this treatment
to be permanent. The only problem with this therapy is that it can only remove
one allergen at a time. There are a number of specially trained chiropractors
across the country which offer this treatment.
Dr. Brian P. Jakes, Jr., N.D., C.N.C. is a Board Certified Doctor of Naturopathy
as well as a Certified Nutritional Consultant. In his practice, in Mandeville,
LA, Dr. Jakes works with physicians to treat a large number of diabetes patients.
[i] Ross J. Allergy to insulin. Pediatr Clin North Am 1984 Jun;31(3):675-87.
[ii] Ganz MA, Unterman T, Roberts M, Uy R, et al. Resistance and allergy to
recombinant human insulin.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990 Jul;86(1):45-51.
[iii] Linana JJ, Montoro FJ, Hernandez MD, Basomba A, et al. Adverse reactions
to insulin. An Med Interna 1997 Jul;14(7):369-72.
[iv] Tokarska L, Dziatkowiak H, Nizankowska E. Allergy to insulin. Pol Tyg
Lek 1994 Jan 3-17;49(1-3):39-42.
[v] Madacsy L, Feher A, Kassay L. High IgE levels in diabetes patientchildren
without atopy or insulin allergy. Acta Paediatr Hung 1987;28(3-4):209-13.
[vi] Velcovsky HG, Federlin KF. Insulin-specific IgG and IgE antibody response
in type I diabetes patientsubjects exclusively treated with human insulin (recombinant
DNA). Diabetes Care 1982 Nov-Dec;5 Suppl 2:126-8.
[vii] Petersen KG, Khalaf A, Naithani V, Gattner H, Kerp L. Diabetes Res Clin
Pract 1989 Jun 20;7(1):41-6.
[viii] Frechtel G, Cardoso AI, Llera AS, Poskus E, Alonso A, Ruiz M. A case
of allergy to human insulin associated with high IgG/IgE ratio for specific
antibodies. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1994 Nov-Dec;4(6):320-3.
[ix] Child DF, Johansson SG. IgE antibody studies in a case of generalized
allergic reaction to human insulin. Allergy 1984 Nov;39(8):630-3.
[x] Tosoni C, Cattaneo R, Valentini U, Rocca L, et al. Prevalence and clinical
meaning of insulin-specific IgE antibodies. Medicina 1990 Oct-Dec;10(4):396-8.
[xi] Sodoyez JC, Koch M, Sodoyez-Goffaux F. Insulin antibodies: methodology
and clinical implications. Diabete Metab 1991 Mar-Apr;17(2):255-69.
[xii] Kim R. Anaphylaxis to protamine masquerading as an insulin allergy. Del
Med J 1993 Jan;65(1):17-23.
[xiii] Dykewicz MS, Kim HW, Orfan N, Yoo TJ, Lieberman P. Immunologic analysis
of anaphylaxis to protamine component in neutral protamine Hagedorn human insulin.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994 Jan:93(1 Pt 1):117-25.
[xiv] Takatsuki H, Ishii H, Yamauchi T, Nakashima N, et al. A case of insulin
allergy: the crystalline human insulin may mask its antigenicity. Diabetes Res
Clin Pract 1991 May;12(2):137-9.
[xv] Nell LJ, Thomas JW. Frequency and specificity of protamine antibodies
in diabetic and control subjects. Diabetes 1988 Feb;37(2):172-6.
[xvi] Grammer L. Insulin allergy. Clin Rev Allergy 1986 May;4(2):189-200.
[xvii] Plantin P, Sassolas B, Guillet MH, Tater D, Guillet G. Cutaneous allergic
accidents caused by insulin. Current aspects apropos of 2 cases. Ann Dermatol
Venereol 1988;115(8):813-7.
[xviii] Kumar D. Lispro analog for treatment of generalized allergy to human
insulin. Diabetes Care 1997 Sep;20(9):1357-9.
[xix] Holdaway IM, Wilson JD. Cutaneous insulin allergy responsive to oral
desensitisation and aspirin.
Br Med J 1984 Dec 8;289(6458):1565-6.
[xx] Kodama M, Kodama T. Vitamin C and the genesis of autoimmune disease and
allergy (review). In Vivo 1995 May-Jun;9(3):231-8.
[xxi] Spijker AJ, Poortman J, Thijssen JH, Erkelens DW. Decrease of circulating
insulin antibodies in two patients treated with continuous subcutaneous infusion
of human insulin (recombinant DNA). Diabetes Care 1982 Nov-Dec;5 Suppl 2:171-4.
[xxii] Nagai T, Nagai Y, Tomizawa T, Mori M. Immediate-type human insulin allergy
successfully treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Intern Med
1997 Aug;36(8):575-8.
[xxiii] Coombs RR, McLaughlan P. Allergenicity of food proteins and its possible
modification. Ann Allergy 1984 Dec;53(6 Pt 2):592-6.
[xxiv] Korman SH, Jabbour S, Harari MD. Multiple hornet (Vespa orientalis)
stings with fatal outcome in a child. J Paediatr Child Health 1990 Oct;26(5):283-5.
[xxv] Moneret-Vautrin DA, Kanny G. Food hypersensitivities. Rev Prat 1996 Apr
15;46(8):961-7.
[xxvi] MacDonald SM, Lichtenstein LM. Histamine-releasing factors and heterogeneity
of IgE. Springer Semin Immunopathol 1990;12(4):415-28.
[xxvii] Simon RA. Adverse reactions to food additives. N Engl Reg Allergy Proc
1986 Nov-Dec;7(6):533-42.
[xxviii] Boris M, Mandel FS. Foods and additives are common causes of the attention
deficit hyperactive disorder in children. Ann Allergy 1994 May;72(5):462-8.
[xxix] Miller ME, Lummus ZL, Bernstein DI. Occupational asthma caused by FD&C
blue dye no.2. Allergy Asthma Proc 1996 Jan-Feb;17(1):31-4.
[xxx] Acero S, Tabar AI, Alvarez MJ, Garcia BE, et al. Occupational asthma
and food allergy due to carmine. Allergy 1998 Sep;53(9):897-901.
[xxxi] Dipalma JR. Tartrazine sensitivity. Am Tam Physician 1990 Nov;42(5):1347-50.
[xxxii] Mikkelsen H, Larsen JC, Tarding F. Hypersensitivity reactions to food
colours with special reference to the natural colour annatto extract (butter
colour). Arch Toxicol Suppl 1978;(1):141-3.
[xxxiii] Chadwick BL, Hunter ML, Evans MT, Hunter B. Allergic reaction to the
food dye patent blue. Br Dent J 1990 May 19;168(10):386-7.
[xxxiv] Kumar A, Rawlings RD, Beaman DC. The mystery ingredients: sweeteners,
flavorings, dyes, and preservatives in analgesic/antipyretic, antihistamine/decongestant,
cough and cold, antidiarrheal, and liquid theophylline preparations. Pediatrics
1993 May;91(5):927-33.
[xxxv] Wuthrich B. Adverse reactions to foods additives. AnnAllergy 1993 Oct;71(4):379-84.
[xxxvi] Goodman DL, McDonnell JT, Nelson HS, Vaughan TR, Weber RW. Chronic
urticaria exacerbated by the antioxidant food preservatives, butylated hydroxyanisole
(BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990 Oct;86(4
Pt 1):570-5.
[xxxvii] Kitts D, Yuan Y, Joneja J, Scott F, et al. Adverse reactions to food
constituents: allergy, intolerance, and autoimmunity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol
1997 Apr;75(4):241-54.
[xxxviii] Boehncke WH, Loeliger C, Kuehnl P, Kalbacher H, Bohm BO, Gall H.
Identification of HLA-DR and –DQ alleles conferring susceptibility to
pollen allergy and pollen associated food allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 1998 Apr;28(4):434-41.
[xxxix] Hanson LA, Soderstrom R, Avanzini A, Bengtsson U, et al. Immunogloblin
subclass deficiency. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1988 May;7(5 Suppl):S17-21.
[xl] Dockhorn RJ. Clinical studies of food allergy in infants and children.
Ann Allergy 1987 Nov;59(5 Pt 2):137-40.
[xli] Bernstein JM. The role of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity in the development
of otitis media with effusion. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992 Feb;25(1):197-211.
[xlii] Barrett B, Vohmann M, Calabrese C. Echinacea for upper respiratory infection.
J Fam Pract 1999 Aug;48(8):628-35.
[xliii] Wustenberg P, Henneicke-von Zepelin HH, Kohler G, Stammwitz U. Efficacy
and mode of action of an immunomodulator herbal preparation containing Echinacea,
wild indigo, and white cedar. Adv Ther 1999 Jan-Feb;16(1):51-70.
[xliv] Brinkeborn RM, Shah DV, Degenring FH. Echinaforce and other Echinacea
fresh plant preparations in the treatment of the common cold. A randomized,
placebo controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Phytomedicine 1999 Mar;6(1):1-6.
[xlv] Henneicke-von Zepelin H, Hentschel C, Schnitker J, Kohnen R, et al. Efficacy
and safety of a fixed combination phytomedicine in the treatment of the common
cold (acute viral respiratory tract infection): results of a randomised, double
blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study. Curr Med Res Opin 1999;15(3):214-27.
[xlvi] Ciprandi G, Canonica GW. Incidence of digestive diseases in patients
with adverse reactions to foods. Ann Allergy 1988 Nov;61(5):334-6.
[xlvii] Goldin BR. Health benefits of probiotics. Br J Nutr 1998 Oct;80(4):S203-7.
[xlviii] Bielory L, Lupoli K. Herbal interventions in asthma and allergy. J
Asthma 1999;36(1):1-65.
[xlix] Kodama M, Kodama T. Vitamin C and the genesis of autoimmune disease
and allergy (review). In Vivo 1995 May-Jun;9(3):231-8.
[l] Kelso JM, Jones RT, Tellez R, Yunginger JW. Oral allergy syndrome successfully
treated with pollen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995 May;74(5):391-6.
DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is independent of the views of our advertisers and sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.
Copyright @ 1999-2013 Diabetes In Control, Inc.. All rights reserved.