Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted and appeared in  BG ControlMedical DevicesInsulinGlucose MonitoringIssue 707

Insulin Pumps vs. Multiple Daily Injections (MDI): Which is Better?

Can insulin pumps reduce glycemic variability in type 1 diabetes?...

Advertisement

A new cross-sectional observational cohort study looked at continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), aka insulin pump, versus multiple daily injections (MDI) to determine which insulin delivery system resulted in less blood glucose variability in type 1 pediatric diabetes patients. Large variations in blood glucose have been implicated in causing cardiovascular complications which can lead to a number of comorbidities and mortality in diabetics.

This recent study was performed in 48 pediatric type 1 diabetes patients, 22 of whom used an insulin pump while the others used MDI. The patients were followed for 3 days using continuous blood glucose monitoring; blood glucose variability was also assessed in 2 consecutive 24 hour periods by a surrogate marker, F2-isoprostanes and/or urinary prostaglandin F2 excretion. Results showed that standard deviation of mean glucose concentration (p<0.05) and insulin requirements, HDL-cholesterol, the mean of glycemic excursions (p<0.01) were statistically lower in the insulin pump group.

While the study did not specifically look at the impact of insulin pump use vs. MDI on cardiovascular complications, one could assume that limiting glucose variations would have a positive impact on the cardiovascular system. The study was small and the MDI groups were even smaller. Each MDI group had somewhere between 4 - 9 patients who were assigned certain insulins whether that be normal, fast acting, basal and/or a combo of thereof. Further research and longitudinal studies would be of benefit to better assess association of CSII therapy versus MDI therapy and their impact on cardiovascular, co-morbidity, and mortality outcomes.

Practice Pearls:

  • Large variations in plasma glucose have been implicated in causing cardiovascular complications.
  • Patients with type 1 diabetes are significantly more likely to develop cardiovascular disease versus their peers.
  • Using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion seems to be associated with reduced variations in blood glucose levels versus using multiple daily injections in type 1 diabetes.

Schreiver, C. et al. Glycemic Variability in Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) or Multiple Daily Injections (MDI). Clin Endocrinol. 2013;79(5):641-647 

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 12 December, 2013 and appeared in  BG ControlMedical DevicesInsulinGlucose MonitoringIssue 707

Past five issues: Issue 796 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 255 | Issue 795 | SGLT-2 Inhibitors Special Edition August 2015 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 254 |

2015 Most Popular Articles:

Coffee Consumption Proves Potential in Reducing Type 2 Diabetes Risk
Posted August 07, 2015
Impaired Glucose Uptake in the Brain May Increase Alzheimer's Disease Risk
Posted August 07, 2015
Ketoacidosis Not as Great as Thought in Diabetes Patients Taking Invokana
Posted August 13, 2015
Impact of Switching Insulin Glargine to Insulin Detemir in T2 Patients
Posted August 14, 2015
First Non-Surgical Weight Loss Procedure for Mild-to-Moderate Obesity
Posted August 07, 2015
Soybean Oil Causes More Obesity and Diabetes Than Fructose
Posted August 20, 2015
SIgnificant Weight Gain Associated with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Posted August 14, 2015
GLP-1 Agonist Semaglutide Completes Phase III Trial with Positive Results
Posted August 07, 2015
Diabetes Combination Drug LixiLan Meets Main Target in Late Stage Trial
Posted August 07, 2015
Two New Possible Methods for Diagnosing and Monitoring Diabetes
Posted August 07, 2015


Browse by Feature Writer & Article Category.
A. Lee Dellon, MD | Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD, FCP, MACP | Beverly Price | Charles W Martin, DD | Derek Lowe, PhD | Dr. Brian Jakes, Jr. | Dr. Fred Pescatore | Dr. Tom Burke, Ph.D | Eric S. Freedland | Evan D. Rosen | Ginger Kanzer-Lewis | Greg Milliger | Kristina Sandstedt | Laura Plunkett | Leonard Lipson, M.A. | Louis H. Philipson | Maria Emanuel Ryan, DDS, PhD | Marilyn Porter, RD, CDE | Melissa Diane Smith | Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, ScD, FASHP | Paul Chous, M.A., OD | Philip A. Wood PhD | R. Keith Campbell, Professor, B.Pharm, MBA, CDE | Richard K. Bernstein, MD | Sheri R. Colberg PhD | Sherri Shafer | Stanley Schwartz, MD, FACP, FACE | Steve Pohlit | Steven V. Edelman, M.D. | Timothy S. Hollingshead |

Cast Your Vote
What percentage of your patients have reached goal for A1c, BP and cholesterol?

CME/CE of the Week
Lois Exelbert,
RN, CDE, BC-ADM, LCCE

Category: Nursing
Credits: 1


Advertisement