Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 29 June, 2012 and appeared in  Cardiovascular HealthMedicationIssue 632

Sulfonylureas Increase Mortality by 50 Percent

Data from a large retrospective cohort study suggested that, diabetic patients treated with three commonly prescribed sulfonylurea drugs had a 50% higher mortality risk compared with patients treated with metformin.... 

Advertisement

The relative risk ranged from 59% with glyburide to 68% with glimepiride. In the subgroup of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), glipizide and glyburide had significant associations with mortality versus metformin but not glimepiride.

Kevin Pantalone, DO, of Summa Western Reserve Hospital in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, said at a press briefing that, "Metformin, when not contraindicated, should be the first-line agent prescribed to control blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes." "This research is relevant to the general public because there are 25.8 million people with diabetes in the U.S. alone, 8.3% of the population," he added. "The medications under study in our report are some of the most commonly prescribed medications utilized in the treatment of type 2 diabetes."

Until recently, sulfonylureas had been considered comparable in safety and effectiveness. Several studies have changed that perception by suggesting that some of the drugs might be safer than others, Pantalone said. Specifically, conflicting results have emerged from studies of the drugs' cardiovascular safety. A theoretical difference in risk exists because the drugs vary with respect to hypoglycemic risk, sulfonylurea receptor selectivity, and effects on myocardial ischemic preconditioning.

Cost is not a distinguishing factor, as all three drugs are available in inexpensive generic forms. Metformin offers an alternative to sulfonylureas as first-line oral therapy for diabetes and also is available as a generic.

To continue the exploration of sulfonylurea safety, Pantalone and collaborators used an enterprise-wide electronic health record (EHR) system to conduct a retrospective study of diabetic patients who started treatment with one of the sulfonylureas or metformin from Oct. 24, 1998 to Oct. 12, 2006.

The search produced records for 23,915 patients. About half (12,774) started treatment with metformin, followed by glipizide (4,325), glyburide (4,279), and glimepiride (2,537). All patients were adults treated in outpatient clinics. Investigators excluded patients using insulin, other injectable diabetes medications, or multiple oral drugs for diabetes.

The patients had a median follow-up of 2.2 years and 2,546 patients died, as verified by the EHR or Social Security Death Index.

Overall, patients treated with a sulfonylurea had a mortality hazard ratio of 1.50 compared with metformin, including:

  • Glipizide -- HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.94
  • Glyburide -- HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.88
  • Glimepiride -- HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.06

Because recent reports suggested sulfonylurea risk varied in patients with CAD, investigators conducted a separate analysis of 2,721 patients with a history of CAD. Pantalone said 419 deaths occurred during follow-up in that subgroup.

As compared with metformin, patients who started treatment with glyburide had a 38% increase in the mortality hazard (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.83), and there was a 41% increased risk in patients started on glipizide (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.87). Only glimepiride was not associated with an increased mortality hazard versus metformin.

"Our results suggest that if a sulfonylurea is required to control blood sugar levels, glimepiride may be the preferred sulfonylurea in those with known coronary artery disease," Pantalone said.

Alvin Powers, MD, of Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., who was not involved in the study feels that the story about sulfonylurea safety will continue to evolve as more information becomes available. "What we really need is a prospective comparison, which is one of the standards now being used by the FDA on the cardiovascular risk of drugs," said Powers, who moderated the press briefing. "We don't know enough about those drugs [sulfonylureas]."

"I think metformin remains the primary drug," he added. "I think that in studies we've shown that glipizide and glimepiride are probably preferred over glyburide because of the length of the studies. I think that, because glycemic control is important, the second-line drug still can be a sulfonylurea."

Practice Pearls:
  • Diabetic patients treated with three commonly prescribed sulfonylurea drugs had a 50% higher mortality risk compared with patients treated with metformin.
  • Point out that cost is not a distinguishing factor, as all three drugs are available in inexpensive generic forms.
  • Note that this study was published as an abstract and presented at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Pantalone KM, et al "Increased risk of overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide, and glimepiride vs. metformin: A retrospective analysis" ENDO 2012. 

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 29 June, 2012 and appeared in  Cardiovascular HealthMedicationIssue 632

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 141 | Issue 681 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 140 | Issue 680 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 139 |

2013 Most Popular Articles:

Mortality Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Posted May 23, 2013
Bacteria in the Gut Improves the Management of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
Posted May 23, 2013
Hypoglycemia Treatment and Prevention Related to Physical Activity
Posted May 31, 2013
Scientist Use Bone Marrow Stem Cells to Cure Type 1 Diabetes
Posted June 06, 2013
Simvastatin Can Reduce the Benefits of Exercise in Active Adults
Posted May 23, 2013
Diabetes Epidemic Growing
Posted May 23, 2013
Co-Q10 May Offset Risk of Diabetes with Statin Use
Posted May 23, 2013
Artificial Sweeteners May Affect Blood Glucose Levels and Insulin Response
Posted June 06, 2013
FDA Advisory Panel Votes to Remove Avandia's Highly Restrictive Label
Posted June 06, 2013
Pros and Cons of Incretin-Based Therapies
Posted May 30, 2013

See more most popular…


Browse by Feature Writer & Article Category.
A. Lee Dellon, MD | Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD, FCP, MACP | Beverly Price | Charles W Martin, DD | Derek Lowe, PhD | Dr. Bernstein | Dr. Brian Jakes, Jr. | Dr. Fred Pescatore | Dr. Tom Burke, Ph.D | Eric S. Freedland | Evan D. Rosen | Ginger Kanzer-Lewis | Greg Milliger | Kristina Sandstedt | Laura Plunkett | Leonard Lipson, M.A. | Louis H. Philipson | Maria Emanuel Ryan, DDS, PhD | Marilyn Porter, RD, CDE | Melissa Diane Smith | Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, ScD, FASHP | Paul Chous, M.A., OD | Philip A. Wood PhD | R. Keith Campbell, Professor, B.Pharm, MBA, CDE | Sheri R. Colberg PhD | Sherri Shafer | Stanley Schwartz, MD, FACP, FACE | Steve Pohlit | Steven V. Edelman, M.D. | Timothy S. Hollingshead |
 
Diabetes In Control Advertisers
 
Cast Your Vote
If the FDA relaxes prescribing restrictions on Avandia, will you recommend it?

Navigate Diabetes In Control



Search Articles On Diabetes In Control