Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 13 June, 2012 and appeared in  Cardiovascular HealthMedicationType 2 DiabetesIssue 630

ADA: Question Answered on Heart or Cancer Risk from Daily Insulin Glargine Use

Daily insulin glargine injections, begun during the early stages of type 2 diabetes, neither increased nor reduced the risk of heart attacks, strokes, cancer or cardiovascular-related mortality, researchers found in the largest and longest study of its kind....

Advertisement

The Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) study randomized more than 12,500 people at high risk for, or in the early stages of, type 2 diabetes to either one daily injection of glargine (insulin) or standard care (no insulin), over a median of 6.2 years. Researchers found no difference among the two groups in cardiovascular outcomes or in the development of any type of cancer, suggesting that daily insulin injections to normalize glucose levels are not harmful when taken over long periods of time. Patients given insulin maintained glucose levels in the normal range (90-94 mg/dL) throughout the duration of the study. 

Some previous studies have suggested a link between insulin use and an increased risk of heart attacks, strokes and several kinds of cancer. But none have examined the long-term impacts of insulin use on serious cardiovascular outcomes and cancers in high-risk individuals, or have followed such a large study population.

Principal Investigator Hertzel Gerstein, MD, McMaster University Department of Medicine in Ontario, stated that, "People have been debating the question of whether there are adverse consequences to long-term insulin use for years." "This study provides the clearest answer yet to that question: No, there are not."

An analysis of data from five European countries -- the largest of the three studies -- found no increased risk of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer with glargine compared with NPH, or "human" insulin, over 3 years, Peter Boyle, PhD, of the International Prevention Research Institute in Lyon, France, and colleagues reported here at the American Diabetes Association meeting.

A U.S. study similarly found no increased risk of any of those cancers among new glargine users compared with NPH insulin when they were followed for about a year, John Buse, MD, PhD, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and colleagues reported.

But an analysis of Kaiser Permanente data, found a modest increase in breast cancer risk over 3 years among new glargine users compared with new users of other insulin (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.8), Laurel Habel, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, Calif., and colleagues reported.

There was no increased risk of breast cancer, however, in patients in that database who'd been on insulin for a longer period of time and had switched from NPH to glargine.

"We think this may be a chance finding," Habel said during a press briefing. "We don't think there's a good biological reason as to why you'd only see [cancer risk] in new users."

Yet Habel cautioned that her study and the others didn't follow patients long term, which would be necessary because cancers take a longer time to develop.

The study did confirm the presence of two previously known side effects of insulin – hypoglycemia and modest weight gain. However, both of these were minor, with patients gaining an average of 3.5 pounds over the duration of the study and experiencing a low rate of hypoglycemia, on average just over one episode per participant per year.

The coprimary outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death. The second coprimary outcomes included those above plus revascularization and hospitalization for heart failure. The researchers also looked at microvascular outcomes, incident diabetes, hyperglycemia, weight, and cancer incidence.

The Kaplan-Meier curves regarding cardiovascular events between the two arms were virtually superimposable, Gerstein said.

The only real difference was the "modest" weight gain (3 lbs. versus 1 lb.) and "modest" rate of hypoglycemia (6% versus 2%) associated with glargine during the study period.

"We now know what the risks are of taking insulin on a long-term basis, and they are low," Gerstein said.

Practice Pearls:
  • Explain that risk of cancer in patients taking insulin glargine was not elevated in three large studies with follow-up times of about 3 years.
  • These studies were published as abstracts and presented at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
  • Note that one of the studies found a modest increased risk of breast cancer among new users of insulin glargine but not among those who switched from NPH to glargine.

Sturmer T, et al "Risk for cancer after initiation of insulin glargine versus NPH -- A new user comparator drug cohort study" ADA2012. Habel L, et al "Insulin glargine and cancer risk: Kaiser Permanente California Cohort Study" ADA 2012.  

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 13 June, 2012 and appeared in  Cardiovascular HealthMedicationType 2 DiabetesIssue 630

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 137 | Issue 677 | SGLT2 Special Edition Issue 2 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 136 | Issue 676 |

2013 Most Popular Articles:

AACE Releases New Comprehensive Diabetes Management Algorithm
Posted April 25, 2013
AACE - New Diabetes Guidelines Based on Tailored Approach
Posted May 09, 2013
Discovery Raises Hope for Type 1 Diabetes Reversal
Posted May 03, 2013
AACE: Ralph A. DeFronzo, MD -- Diabetes Prevention Supports More Aggressive and Earlier Intervention
Posted May 09, 2013
Diabetes Increases Cancer Risk by 20 Percent
Posted May 16, 2013
AACE – New Test Efficiently Detects Diabetic Neuropathy
Posted May 09, 2013
Intermittent Fasting May Improve Diabetes and Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Posted May 03, 2013
AACE: CAD Risk for Pre-Diabetes Similar to Diabetes
Posted May 09, 2013
Low-Glycemic Diet Seen to Reverse Diastolic Dysfunction of Diabetes
Posted May 03, 2013
How Type 2 Diabetes Develops
Posted May 16, 2013

See more most popular…


Browse by Feature Writer & Article Category.
A. Lee Dellon, MD | Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD, FCP, MACP | Beverly Price | Charles W Martin, DD | Derek Lowe, PhD | Dr. Bernstein | Dr. Brian Jakes, Jr. | Dr. Fred Pescatore | Dr. Tom Burke, Ph.D | Eric S. Freedland | Evan D. Rosen | Ginger Kanzer-Lewis | Greg Milliger | Kristina Sandstedt | Laura Plunkett | Leonard Lipson, M.A. | Louis H. Philipson | Maria Emanuel Ryan, DDS, PhD | Marilyn Porter, RD, CDE | Melissa Diane Smith | Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, ScD, FASHP | Paul Chous, M.A., OD | Philip A. Wood PhD | R. Keith Campbell, Professor, B.Pharm, MBA, CDE | Sheri R. Colberg PhD | Sherri Shafer | Stanley Schwartz, MD, FACP, FACE | Steve Pohlit | Steven V. Edelman, M.D. | Timothy S. Hollingshead |
 
Diabetes In Control Advertisers
 
Cast Your Vote
What test do you use to screen for prediabetes?

Navigate Diabetes In Control



Search Articles On Diabetes In Control