Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted and appeared in  Women's HealthIssue 612

50GM Glucose Challenge Test an Acceptable Screen for Gestational Diabetes

The 50-g glucose challenge test is an "acceptable" screening test for GDM but it can't replace the OGTT....

Advertisement

GDM affects between 2% and 9% of pregnant women in Western countries and is often asymptomatic. Research has shown that treating GDM with diet or insulin improves both perinatal and maternal outcomes, making detection important. Yet the best way to identify women with GDM is unclear.

In their report, Dr. Marsha van Leeuwen from Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam and colleagues say that while the 50-g glucose challenge test is not recommended in the majority of national guidelines, "it could be a useful test in the diagnostic work up of GDM."

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, they evaluated it as a first-step screening test for GDM and as a replacement for the OGTT, the current diagnostic test.

Altogether they looked at 26 relevant studies (in 13,564 women) that compared the 50-g glucose challenge test to the OGTT before 32 weeks gestation. The reference standard was the 75-g OGTT in six studies and the 100-g OGTT in the other 20 papers.

In studies of women with risk factors for GDM, such as a prior affected pregnancy, the 50-g glucose challenge test had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 and a pooled specificity of 0.77 (for a threshold value of 7.8 mmol/L). The test had "modest" accuracy for GDM, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 3.2 and 0.34, respectively, the researchers say.

Results were similar in studies that consecutively recruited participants, with sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive likelihood ratios of 0.74, 0.85, 4.9 and 0.31, respectively.

The researchers found that increasing the threshold for disease (OGTT result) increased the sensitivity of the challenge test and decreased the specificity.

Dr. van Leeuwen and colleagues say that while higher detection rates "would be preferable," the 74% detection rate of the 50-g glucose challenge test "might be acceptable if used a screening test."

They emphasize, however, that to use the 50-g glucose challenge test as a definite diagnostic test for GDM, in place of the OGTT, "higher accuracy measures are warranted."

On the other hand, they say clinicians could consider a one-step method, using the OGTT for screening for example in selected women, such as those with risk factors for GDM. This could be less burdensome for patients, and more cost-effective than a two-step method in which a glucose loading test might be performed twice.

Online January 20 in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (BJOG)

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 08 February, 2012 and appeared in  Women's HealthIssue 612

Past five issues: Issue 778 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 237 | GLP-1 Special Editions April 2015 | Issue 777 | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 236 |

2015 Most Popular Articles:

A Potential New Type 2 Diabetes Indicator
Posted April 02, 2015
Glyburide Used for Gestational Diabetes May Increase Risk of Birth Complications
Posted April 02, 2015
A Third Treatment Option in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes
Posted April 02, 2015
Gastric Electrical Stimulation an Alternative to Insulin Injections?
Posted April 02, 2015
A Novel Scale May Indicate Glycemic Progression to Type 1 Diabetes
Posted April 02, 2015
Women Retain Insulin Sensitivity Better than Men
Posted April 02, 2015
Artificial Pancreas Software Algorithm Receives Approval in Europe
Posted April 02, 2015
Glycemic Control and Medications in T2DM Elderly with Dementia
Posted April 02, 2015
HbA1c and OGTT Performance in Prediabetic Obese Adolescents
Posted April 02, 2015
Type 2 Diabetes and Other Diseases Risk Related to Increase in Artificial Light?
Posted April 02, 2015


Browse by Feature Writer & Article Category.
A. Lee Dellon, MD | Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD, FCP, MACP | Beverly Price | Charles W Martin, DD | Derek Lowe, PhD | Dr. Brian Jakes, Jr. | Dr. Fred Pescatore | Dr. Tom Burke, Ph.D | Eric S. Freedland | Evan D. Rosen | Ginger Kanzer-Lewis | Greg Milliger | Kristina Sandstedt | Laura Plunkett | Leonard Lipson, M.A. | Louis H. Philipson | Maria Emanuel Ryan, DDS, PhD | Marilyn Porter, RD, CDE | Melissa Diane Smith | Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, ScD, FASHP | Paul Chous, M.A., OD | Philip A. Wood PhD | R. Keith Campbell, Professor, B.Pharm, MBA, CDE | Richard K. Bernstein, MD | Sheri R. Colberg PhD | Sherri Shafer | Stanley Schwartz, MD, FACP, FACE | Steve Pohlit | Steven V. Edelman, M.D. | Timothy S. Hollingshead |

Cast Your Vote
What percent of your patients have reached their A1c target?
CME/CE of the Week
Presented by CardioCareLive
Category: Cardiology



Search Articles On Diabetes In Control