Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 23 March, 2010 and appeared in  Issue 514Cardiovascular HealthCulturally Aware CareMedicationType 2 Diabetes

No Benefit in Adding Fenofibrate to Statin for Preventing Cardiovascular Events

In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)-Lipid trial, the combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin, compared with simvastatin alone, failed to reduce cardiovascular events in the majority of patients with Type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease.

Advertisement

After a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, major cardiovascular events were reported at an annual rate of 2.41% (310 events) in patients receiving a statin plus placebo versus 2.24% in patients receiving a statin plus fenofibrate (hazard ratio [HR] in the fenofibrate group = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.79-1.08; P = .32).

Henry Ginsberg, MD, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, NY, stated that, "ACCORD-Lipid does not support use of the combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin compared with simvastatin alone to reduce cardiovascular events."

In the multicentre, double-blinded study, researchers randomised 5,518 patients with Type 2 diabetes plus documented cardiovascular disease, evidence of subclinical cardiovascular disease or at least 2 additional cardiovascular risk factors, to receive simvastatin 20 to 40 mg/day plus fenofibrate 54 to 160 mg/day (n = 2,765), or simvastatin plus placebo (n = 2,753).

The primary endpoint was first occurrence of a major cardiovascular event (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, or combined risk of cardiovascular death).

Patients had an Hb A1c of >=7.5%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was between 60 and 180 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was <55 mg/dL for women and African Americans or <50 mg/dL for all other groups; and triglycerides were <750 mg/dL (untreated) or <400 mg/dL (on a lipid medication).

Prespecified subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneity in treatment effect according to sex, with a benefit for men and possible harm for women (P = .01 for interaction), and a possible interaction according to lipid subgroup, with a possible benefit for patients with both a high baseline triglyceride level and a low baseline level of HDL-C (P = .057 for interaction).

During the ACC press conference, Dr. Ginsberg commented, "I see patients with the worst lipid disorders and the highest risk… I add fenofibrate to a statin in those people whose triglycerides are over 200 mg/dL and whose HDL-C is in the mid-thirties. I think that if the general population of physicians who treat patients with diabetes want to accept this subgroup analysis as being meaningful, they might want to expand their use of this drug."

59th Annual Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) during a late-breaking presentation. [Presentation title: Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid Trial. Late-Breaking Clinical Trials I]

 

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 23 March, 2010 and appeared in  Issue 514Cardiovascular HealthCulturally Aware CareMedicationType 2 Diabetes

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 85 | Issue 626 | Special Edition - Getting Patients on Track | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 84 | Issue 625 |

 
Diabetes In Control Advertisers
 
 
Cast Your Vote
Now that once-weekly GLP-1 is available, which product are you recommending for your type 2 patients?

Navigate Diabetes In Control
Announcement:
Search Articles On Diabetes In Control