Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 27 September, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 488ObesityType 2 Diabetes

Obesity Alone May Be the Best Predictor of Undiagnosed Diabetes

Obesity alone may be the best predictor of undiagnosed diabetes, according to the results of the Diabscreen Study recently reported in a published journal.

Advertisement

"In screening for Type 2 diabetes, guidelines recommend targeting high-risk individuals," write Erwin P. Klein Woolthuis, MD, from Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre in The Netherlands, and colleagues. "Our objectives were to assess the yield of opportunistic targeted screening for Type 2 diabetes in primary care and to assess the diagnostic value of various risk factors."

This study was conducted in The Netherlands at 11 family practices with a total practice population of 49,229 patients. Among patients aged 45 to 75 years, the investigators conducted stepwise opportunistic screening as follows: (1) using the electronic medical record, high-risk individuals with 1 or more risk factors for diabetes and low-risk individuals were identified; (2) a capillary fasting plasma glucose measurement was obtained and repeated on a different day if the value exceeded 110 mg/dL; and (3) a venous sample was obtained if both capillary fasting plasma glucose values exceeded 110 mg/dL and at least 1 sample was 126 mg/dL or higher.

Outcome measures included the yield of screening, defined as the percentage of invited patients with undiagnosed diabetes, the number needed to screen (NNS), and the diagnostic value of various risk factors (odds ratio [OR] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]).

There were 3724 high-risk patients seen during usual care who were invited for a first capillary measurement (response rate, 90%), as well as a random sample of 465 low-risk patients contacted by mail (response rate, 86%). Previously undiagnosed diabetes was ultimately detected in 101 high-risk patients (2.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2% -- 3.3%; NNS, 37) and 2 low-risk patients (0.4%; 95% CI, 0.1% -- 1.6%; NNS, 233; P <.01). Screening resulted in the prevalence of diabetes among patients 45 to 75 years old increasing from 6.1% to 6.8%.

Among diagnostic models using a variety of risk factors, the best predictor of undiagnosed diabetes was a model containing obesity alone (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.0 -- 5.2; AUC, 0.63).

"The yield of opportunistic targeted screening was fair; obesity alone was the best predictor of undiagnosed diabetes," the study authors write. "Opportunistic screening for Type 2 diabetes in primary care could target middle-aged and older adults with obesity."

"With an opportunistic targeted screening program like ours, diabetes screening in primary care can be performed systematically and continuously, with probably few drawbacks for both patients and health care workers, and with efficient use of resources," the study authors write. "Further research is needed to estimate its cost-effectiveness and limitations. Also, sensitivity and specificity of our stepwise approach need to be studied."

Ann Fam Med. September/October 2009;7:422–430. Abstract

 

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 27 September, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 488ObesityType 2 Diabetes

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 85 | Issue 626 | Special Edition - Getting Patients on Track | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 84 | Issue 625 |

 
Diabetes In Control Advertisers
 
 
Cast Your Vote
Now that once-weekly GLP-1 is available, which product are you recommending for your type 2 patients?

Navigate Diabetes In Control
Announcement:
Search Articles On Diabetes In Control