Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 20 September, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 487Cardiovascular Health

Increased Risk for PAD for Women with Metabolic Syndrome

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) in women is associated with an increased risk for future symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), according to the results of a prospective cohort study.

Advertisement

David Conen, MD, MPH, from the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, writes that, MetS is associated with incident myocardial infarction and stroke and is linked with subclinical inflammation. "However, prospective data pertaining to MetS and future...PAD are sparse with few studies examining the role of inflammation. We therefore evaluated the relationship between MetS, inflammation, and incident PAD."

The study cohort consisted of 27,111 women who had no cardiovascular disease at baseline and who were enrolled in the Women's Health Study. During follow-up (median duration, 13.3 years), 114 women went on to have incident symptomatic PAD. Risk for PAD among women with and without MetS was compared with use of Cox proportional hazards models.

To determine associations between MetS and subclinical inflammation, the investigators measured high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and used multivariable models to adjust for these biomarkers.

Risk for future PAD was increased by 62% in women with MetS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 - 2.38). MetS remained significantly associated with PAD after multivariable adjustment (adjusted HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01 - 2.18). For each additional MetS-defining trait (abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, high triglyceride levels, and abnormal glucose metabolism), there was a 21% increase in risk (adjusted HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06 - 1.39).

Median levels of hsCRP were 4.0 mg/L in women with MetS and 1.5 mg/L (P < .0001) in women without MetS (P < .0001). For sICAM-1, levels were 374 ng/mL and 333 ng/mL, respectively. The risk associated with MetS was markedly decreased and was no longer significant when hsCRP and sICAM-1 were added to multivariable models (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.75 - 1.73).

"MetS is associated with an increased risk of future symptomatic PAD in women," the study authors write. "This risk appears largely mediated by the effects of inflammation and endothelial activation."

Limitations of this study include a study cohort of women who are of predominantly Caucasian origin, limiting generalizability, and exclusion of subclinical PAD. In addition, this analysis used a modified version of the official Adult Treatment Panel III MetS definition.

"Prospective data from other cohorts are greatly needed not only to corroborate our results but also to further elucidate mechanistic links between risk factor clustering and onset of this disease," the study authors conclude.

Circulation, Published online September 8, 2009. Abstract

 

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 20 September, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 487Cardiovascular Health

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 85 | Issue 626 | Special Edition - Getting Patients on Track | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 84 | Issue 625 |

 
Diabetes In Control Advertisers
 
 
Cast Your Vote
Now that once-weekly GLP-1 is available, which product are you recommending for your type 2 patients?

Navigate Diabetes In Control
Announcement:
Search Articles On Diabetes In Control