Sign up for our complimentary
weekly e-journal

Main Newsletter
Mastery Series
Therapy Series
 
Bookmark and Share | Print Article | Items for the Week Previous | All Articles This Week | Next
This article originally posted 05 May, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 467Type 2 Diabetes

CRP Measurement Doesn’t Improve Mortality Prediction in Diabetics

Plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) values are associated with mortality risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes, but are no more useful than traditional risk factors for predicting 5-year mortality in this population...

Advertisement

The Italian research team, headed by Dr. Graziella Bruno at the University of Torino notes, "Conflicting results on the incremental usefulness of CRP measurements for cardiovascular prediction have been provided in nondiabetic subjects, whereas no data are available in subjects with Type 2 diabetes."

CRP measurements were available for 2,381 diabetic patients. During follow-up for a median of 5.4 years, 496 subjects died. The all-cause mortality rate was 42.3 per 1000 person years.

All-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were significantly higher with CRP >3 mg/mL, independently of other classic risk factors (hazard ratios 1.51 and 1.44, respectively). The association was also found for diabetics who were normoalbuminuric and in those with no evidence of CVD at baseline.

CRP values were positively correlated with body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, total and LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, uric acid, and albumin excretion rate. There was a negative correlation between CRP and HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 (p < 0.0001 for all).

Still, the research team maintains, "From a clinical point of view, CRP measurement allows the reclassification of a very limited proportion of patients on the basis of their 5-year probability of surviving."

"Thus," they add, "the usefulness of this measurement in addition to other risk factors commonly used in clinical practice by diabetologists does not seem justified at present."

This conclusion is from the ongoing prospective, population-based Casale Monferrato Study in Italy.

Diabetes. April 2009; 58:798-799, 926-933.

Advertisement


 

Bookmark and Share | Print | Category | Home

This article originally posted 05 May, 2009 and appeared in  Issue 467Type 2 Diabetes

Past five issues: Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 85 | Issue 626 | Special Edition - Getting Patients on Track | Diabetes Clinical Mastery Series Issue 84 | Issue 625 |

 
Diabetes In Control Advertisers
 
 
Cast Your Vote
Now that once-weekly GLP-1 is available, which product are you recommending for your type 2 patients?

Navigate Diabetes In Control
Announcement:
Search Articles On Diabetes In Control